Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Locality Sensitive Hashing for Set-Queries, Motivated by Group Recommendations (2004.07286v3)

Published 15 Apr 2020 in cs.DS, cs.CG, and cs.IR

Abstract: Locality Sensitive Hashing (LSH) is an effective method to index a set of points such that we can efficiently find the nearest neighbors of a query point. We extend this method to our novel Set-query LSH (SLSH), such that it can find the nearest neighbors of a set of points, given as a query. Let $ s(x,y) $ be the similarity between two points $ x $ and $ y $. We define a similarity between a set $ Q$ and a point $ x $ by aggregating the similarities $ s(p,x) $ for all $ p\in Q $. For example, we can take $ s(p,x) $ to be the angular similarity between $ p $ and $ x $ (i.e., $1-{\angle (x,p)}/{\pi}$), and aggregate by arithmetic or geometric averaging, or taking the lowest similarity. We develop locality sensitive hash families and data structures for a large set of such arithmetic and geometric averaging similarities, and analyze their collision probabilities. We also establish an analogous framework and hash families for distance functions. Specifically, we give a structure for the euclidean distance aggregated by either averaging or taking the maximum. We leverage SLSH to solve a geometric extension of the approximate near neighbors problem. In this version, we consider a metric for which the unit ball is an ellipsoid and its orientation is specified with the query. An important application that motivates our work is group recommendation systems. Such a system embeds movies and users in the same feature space, and the task of recommending a movie for a group to watch together, translates to a set-query $ Q $ using an appropriate similarity.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (2)
  1. Haim Kaplan (111 papers)
  2. Jay Tenenbaum (6 papers)
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.