Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
110 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

SpaceNet 6: Multi-Sensor All Weather Mapping Dataset (2004.06500v1)

Published 14 Apr 2020 in eess.IV and cs.CV

Abstract: Within the remote sensing domain, a diverse set of acquisition modalities exist, each with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. Yet, most of the current literature and open datasets only deal with electro-optical (optical) data for different detection and segmentation tasks at high spatial resolutions. optical data is often the preferred choice for geospatial applications, but requires clear skies and little cloud cover to work well. Conversely, Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) sensors have the unique capability to penetrate clouds and collect during all weather, day and night conditions. Consequently, SAR data are particularly valuable in the quest to aid disaster response, when weather and cloud cover can obstruct traditional optical sensors. Despite all of these advantages, there is little open data available to researchers to explore the effectiveness of SAR for such applications, particularly at very-high spatial resolutions, i.e. <1m Ground Sample Distance (GSD). To address this problem, we present an open Multi-Sensor All Weather Mapping (MSAW) dataset and challenge, which features two collection modalities (both SAR and optical). The dataset and challenge focus on mapping and building footprint extraction using a combination of these data sources. MSAW covers 120 km2 over multiple overlapping collects and is annotated with over 48,000 unique building footprints labels, enabling the creation and evaluation of mapping algorithms for multi-modal data. We present a baseline and benchmark for building footprint extraction with SAR data and find that state-of-the-art segmentation models pre-trained on optical data, and then trained on SAR (F1 score of 0.21) outperform those trained on SAR data alone (F1 score of 0.135).

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (11)
  1. Jacob Shermeyer (7 papers)
  2. Daniel Hogan (6 papers)
  3. Jason Brown (21 papers)
  4. Adam Van Etten (17 papers)
  5. Nicholas Weir (4 papers)
  6. Fabio Pacifici (2 papers)
  7. Ronny Haensch (2 papers)
  8. Alexei Bastidas (4 papers)
  9. Scott Soenen (1 paper)
  10. Todd Bacastow (1 paper)
  11. Ryan Lewis (7 papers)
Citations (97)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.