Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Parallel Batch-Dynamic $k$-Clique Counting (2003.13585v2)

Published 30 Mar 2020 in cs.DS and cs.DC

Abstract: In this paper, we study new batch-dynamic algorithms for the $k$-clique counting problem, which are dynamic algorithms where the updates are batches of edge insertions and deletions. We study this problem in the parallel setting, where the goal is to obtain algorithms with low (polylogarithmic) depth. Our first result is a new parallel batch-dynamic triangle counting algorithm with $O(\Delta\sqrt{\Delta+m})$ amortized work and $O(\log* (\Delta+m))$ depth with high probability, and $O(\Delta+m)$ space for a batch of $\Delta$ edge insertions or deletions. Our second result is an algebraic algorithm based on parallel fast matrix multiplication. Assuming that a parallel fast matrix multiplication algorithm exists with parallel matrix multiplication constant $\omega_p$, the same algorithm solves dynamic $k$-clique counting with $O\left(\min\left(\Delta m{\frac{(2k - 1)\omega_p}{3(\omega_p + 1)}}, (\Delta+m){\frac{2(k + 1)\omega_p}{3(\omega_p + 1)}}\right)\right)$ amortized work and $O(\log (\Delta+m))$ depth with high probability, and $O\left((\Delta+m){\frac{2(k + 1)\omega_p}{3(\omega_p + 1)}}\right)$ space. Using a recently developed parallel $k$-clique counting algorithm, we also obtain a simple batch-dynamic algorithm for $k$-clique counting on graphs with arboricity $\alpha$ running in $O(\Delta(m+\Delta)\alpha{k-4})$ expected work and $O(\log{k-2} n)$ depth with high probability, and $O(m + \Delta)$ space. Finally, we present a multicore CPU implementation of our parallel batch-dynamic triangle counting algorithm. On a 72-core machine with two-way hyper-threading, our implementation achieves 36.54--74.73x parallel speedup, and in certain cases achieves significant speedups over existing parallel algorithms for the problem, which are not theoretically-efficient.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Laxman Dhulipala (51 papers)
  2. Quanquan C. Liu (28 papers)
  3. Julian Shun (53 papers)
  4. Shangdi Yu (17 papers)
Citations (21)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.