Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
80 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Meta-Baseline: Exploring Simple Meta-Learning for Few-Shot Learning (2003.04390v4)

Published 9 Mar 2020 in cs.CV and cs.LG

Abstract: Meta-learning has been the most common framework for few-shot learning in recent years. It learns the model from collections of few-shot classification tasks, which is believed to have a key advantage of making the training objective consistent with the testing objective. However, some recent works report that by training for whole-classification, i.e. classification on the whole label-set, it can get comparable or even better embedding than many meta-learning algorithms. The edge between these two lines of works has yet been underexplored, and the effectiveness of meta-learning in few-shot learning remains unclear. In this paper, we explore a simple process: meta-learning over a whole-classification pre-trained model on its evaluation metric. We observe this simple method achieves competitive performance to state-of-the-art methods on standard benchmarks. Our further analysis shed some light on understanding the trade-offs between the meta-learning objective and the whole-classification objective in few-shot learning.

An Analysis of "Meta-Baseline: Exploring Simple Meta-Learning for Few-Shot Learning"

The paper "Meta-Baseline: Exploring Simple Meta-Learning for Few-Shot Learning" by Yinbo Chen, Zhuang Liu, Huijuan Xu, Trevor Darrell, and Xiaolong Wang presents a compelling examination of the effectiveness of meta-learning techniques for few-shot learning tasks. The work investigates the interplay between two prevailing methodologies in few-shot learning: meta-learning and whole-classification training, exploring how these approaches can be optimized to enhance performance.

Core Concepts and Methodologies

Few-shot learning represents a significant challenge, as it involves training models to make accurate predictions with a minimal amount of labeled data. Meta-learning, or "learning to learn," has emerged as a popular framework to address this challenge. It involves training a model on a multitude of tasks with few examples each, ensuring that the model generalizes well across different tasks with limited samples. The paper juxtaposes this against whole-classification training, which involves training a model to perform classification across the entire dataset of existing labels instead.

The authors propose a straightforward technique, dubbed Meta-Baseline, which involves pre-training a model using a whole-classification approach, then applying meta-learning on top of the pre-trained model using its evaluation metrics. The central premise is that this sequence can lead to competitive performance on standard benchmarks when compared to more sophisticated meta-learning techniques.

Key Findings and Contributions

  1. Simple Yet Effective Method: The research posits that pre-training with whole-classification followed by meta-learning can yield performance levels rivaling state-of-the-art complex meta-learning methodologies, despite the simplicity of the Meta-Baseline approach.
  2. Objective Discrepancy and Trade-offs: The paper unveils a potential trade-off between meta-learning and whole-classification objectives. While meta-learning refines model performance on similar NN-way KK-shot tasks, whole-classification tends to produce embeddings with enhanced class transferability. This trade-off is critical as the consistent alignment of training and testing objectives does not always yield optimal outcomes.
  3. Empirical Validation: Through comprehensive experimentation on benchmark datasets such as miniImageNet, tieredImageNet, and ImageNet-800, and additional tests on the Meta-Dataset, the authors demonstrate that the Meta-Baseline method delivers commendable results. A consistent observation is the power of cosine nearest-centroid classification, providing a reliable metric to bridge the gap between pre-training and meta-learning stages.
  4. Dataset and Task Implications: The research suggests that the choice of base classes during training critically influences the generalizability on novel classes. It highlights the importance of tailoring dataset compositions to feasibly converge novel class generalization towards base class generalization.

Implications and Speculations

The observations provided in this paper are pivotal for understanding the balance needed between model training paradigms in few-shot learning. The practical advantage of the proposed strategy underscores its potential application in scenarios where computational and architectural simplicity is preferred.

In a broader sense, the insights into the trade-offs between meta-learning and whole-classification objectives may inform future work on optimizing few-shot learning models, potentially leading to hybrid models that dynamically adjust their training focus based on task characteristics.

Future Developments

In light of the findings, future research may seek to:

  • Explore adaptive models that dynamically balance meta-learning and whole-classification training based on the domain or task requirements.
  • Investigate the applicability of Meta-Baseline in domains beyond image classification, where few-shot learning is crucial, such as natural language processing and robotics.
  • Further elucidate the role of dataset construction in optimizing generalization performance across unseen classes.

In summary, "Meta-Baseline: Exploring Simple Meta-Learning for Few-Shot Learning" offers a thorough analysis of existing methodologies, presenting a pragmatic alternative with substantial implications for the advancement of few-shot learning research.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (5)
  1. Yinbo Chen (11 papers)
  2. Zhuang Liu (63 papers)
  3. Huijuan Xu (30 papers)
  4. Trevor Darrell (324 papers)
  5. Xiaolong Wang (243 papers)
Citations (299)