Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
102 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Fine-Grained Visual Classification via Progressive Multi-Granularity Training of Jigsaw Patches (2003.03836v3)

Published 8 Mar 2020 in cs.CV

Abstract: Fine-grained visual classification (FGVC) is much more challenging than traditional classification tasks due to the inherently subtle intra-class object variations. Recent works mainly tackle this problem by focusing on how to locate the most discriminative parts, more complementary parts, and parts of various granularities. However, less effort has been placed to which granularities are the most discriminative and how to fuse information cross multi-granularity. In this work, we propose a novel framework for fine-grained visual classification to tackle these problems. In particular, we propose: (i) a progressive training strategy that effectively fuses features from different granularities, and (ii) a random jigsaw patch generator that encourages the network to learn features at specific granularities. We obtain state-of-the-art performances on several standard FGVC benchmark datasets, where the proposed method consistently outperforms existing methods or delivers competitive results. The code will be available at https://github.com/PRIS-CV/PMG-Progressive-Multi-Granularity-Training.

An Analytical Exploration of Fine-Grained Visual Classification via Progressive Multi-Granularity Training

The paper "Fine-Grained Visual Classification via Progressive Multi-Granularity Training of Jigsaw Patches" introduces an innovative approach to fine-grained visual classification (FGVC), a domain characterized by the challenge of distinguishing between subclasses of objects with subtle intra-class variations. While traditional methodologies have focused largely on detecting discriminative features in different object parts or using weakly-supervised methods to locate discriminative regions, this paper emphasizes exploiting the discriminative power across various granularities and how they can be effectively integrated for improved classification performance.

Methodology

The authors propose a novel framework comprising two main components: a progressive training strategy and a jigsaw puzzle generator.

  1. Progressive Training Strategy: The backbone of the proposed method is a progressive training approach that incorporates multi-granularity feature learning incrementally. This strategy entails staging the network training across various levels of granularity, starting from finer details and progressively moving towards coarser features. This incremental process enables the network to cultivate complementary properties specific to each granularity stage by passing learned parameters to successive stages, an approach that inherently addresses the challenge of large intra-class variations.
  2. Jigsaw Puzzle Generator: The introduction of a jigsaw puzzle generator serves as a mechanism to generate patches of varying granularity levels, thereby facilitating the progressive training strategy. By dividing images into shuffled patches, the approach stimulates learning of features specific to each granularity without relying on explicit scale transformations. This process ensures that features learned are granular-specific, further reinforcing the network's ability to discern fine-grained features effectively.

Experimental Evaluation

The effectiveness of the proposed methodology is validated across several standard FGVC benchmark datasets including Caltech UCSD-Birds (CUB), Stanford Cars (CAR), and FGVC-Aircraft (AIR). The results are commendable, with the methodology achieving state-of-the-art or competitive performances across the benchmarks:

  • CUB-200-2011: The framework achieved a performance of 89.6%, indicating robust performance under varied image scenarios.
  • Stanford Cars: The method realized an accuracy of 95.1%, illustrating its efficacy in identifying intricate details needed to distinguish between different car models.
  • FGVC-Aircraft: Achieving 93.4%, the methodology displayed its capability to handle substantial intra-class variations characterized by aircraft designs.

Discussion and Implications

One of the pivotal strengths of the proposed PMG framework lies in its elegant integration of progressive training with feature fusion across multiple granularities, without requiring manual annotations besides category labels. This eliminates the requirement for complex part mining processes or heavy reliance on strong supervision, thereby reducing computational inference time while maintaining high classification accuracy.

The implications of the framework extend into both theoretical and practical realms. The approach demonstrates that progressive granularity learning can significantly enhance the model's discriminatory capability, which could be generalized to other domains requiring granularity-specific feature learning. Practically, this methodology offers a streamlined yet effective tool for FGVC tasks, providing a potential pathway for enhancing applications in automated visual inspection, biodiversity assessment, and more.

Future Directions

The paper sets the stage for further explorations in extending progressive feature learning frameworks to other complex classification problems, potentially integrating advanced backbones for enhanced performance. Additionally, further refinements in granularity processing, perhaps through more sophisticated patch combination techniques, could provide further gains in accuracy and robustness.

In conclusion, this research contributes a valuable perspective to FGVC methodologies, leveraging progressive multi-granularity learning as a means to augment feature richness and classification accuracy. Its novel approach and substantial empirical validation position it as a meaningful development in the field of computer vision.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (7)
  1. Ruoyi Du (17 papers)
  2. Dongliang Chang (25 papers)
  3. Ayan Kumar Bhunia (63 papers)
  4. Jiyang Xie (21 papers)
  5. Zhanyu Ma (103 papers)
  6. Yi-Zhe Song (120 papers)
  7. Jun Guo (130 papers)
Citations (264)