Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

IMRAM: Iterative Matching with Recurrent Attention Memory for Cross-Modal Image-Text Retrieval (2003.03772v1)

Published 8 Mar 2020 in cs.CV

Abstract: Enabling bi-directional retrieval of images and texts is important for understanding the correspondence between vision and language. Existing methods leverage the attention mechanism to explore such correspondence in a fine-grained manner. However, most of them consider all semantics equally and thus align them uniformly, regardless of their diverse complexities. In fact, semantics are diverse (i.e. involving different kinds of semantic concepts), and humans usually follow a latent structure to combine them into understandable languages. It may be difficult to optimally capture such sophisticated correspondences in existing methods. In this paper, to address such a deficiency, we propose an Iterative Matching with Recurrent Attention Memory (IMRAM) method, in which correspondences between images and texts are captured with multiple steps of alignments. Specifically, we introduce an iterative matching scheme to explore such fine-grained correspondence progressively. A memory distillation unit is used to refine alignment knowledge from early steps to later ones. Experiment results on three benchmark datasets, i.e. Flickr8K, Flickr30K, and MS COCO, show that our IMRAM achieves state-of-the-art performance, well demonstrating its effectiveness. Experiments on a practical business advertisement dataset, named \Ads{}, further validates the applicability of our method in practical scenarios.

Analyzing IMRAM: A Method for Cross-Modal Image-Text Retrieval

The paper "IMRAM: Iterative Matching with Recurrent Attention Memory for Cross-Modal Image-Text Retrieval" addresses the intricate task of cross-modal retrieval, focusing on the alignment of visual and linguistic data to facilitate effective retrieval of images given textual queries and vice versa. The proposed Iterative Matching with Recurrent Attention Memory (IMRAM) method offers a progressive approach to achieve fine-grained image-text correspondence. The method is evaluated thoroughly against multiple benchmarks, illustrating its improvement over existing techniques.

Methodology Overview

IMRAM introduces an iterative matching scheme integrated with a Recurrent Attention Memory (RAM) framework to enhance the alignment between image and text fragments. This method is structured around two major innovations:

  1. Iterative Matching Scheme: The process employs multiple steps to progressively refine the alignment between image regions and text words, as opposed to conventional methods that often treat this step as a one-off alignment process. This staged approach allows the method to accumulate semantic cues and refine the understanding of the relationship between modalities at each step.
  2. Recurrent Attention Memory (RAM): Within this iterative scheme, RAM comprises two components: a cross-modal attention unit processes and aligns image and text fragments, while a memory distillation unit dynamically refines and transfers alignment information across iterations. This recurrent attention architecture enables the memory of previously captured semantic connections to inform and improve current alignments, accommodating the diverse and complex nature of semantics encountered in this task.

Experimental Results

IMRAM’s performance was evaluated on several benchmark datasets: Flickr8K, Flickr30K, and MS COCO, as well as a practical dataset, KWAI-AD, designed to mimic real-world business advertisement scenarios. The experimental results highlighted several interesting findings:

  • Performance Metrics: IMRAM demonstrated noticeable improvements in recall rates for image-to-text and text-to-image retrieval tasks compared to state-of-the-art methods, notably surpassing models like SCAN and VSRN. For instance, IMRAM achieved a Recall@1 of 76.7% on the MS COCO 1K dataset—a significant improvement over previous models.
  • Scalability and Versatility: The model's versatility was evident in its consistent performance on both standard datasets and the KWAI-AD dataset, the latter presenting additional challenges due to weaker associations between images and captions, mimicking real-world applications more closely.

Implications and Future Directions

The authors' approach with IMRAM not only offers a robust improvement in aligning complex semantic elements within cross-modal datasets but also indicates a shift towards more adaptable cross-modal retrieval systems that can accommodate real-world complexity. The sequential accumulative strategy of the RAM architecture shows promise in refining semantic understanding, a crucial aspect for developing more sophisticated cross-modal applications, particularly in sectors like automated content recommendation or digital marketing.

Future research might explore integrating this iterative matching framework with emerging large-scale pre-trained models to further push the envelope in performance by leveraging broader contextual knowledge. Such hybrid models could aim to blend the iterative refinement benefits seen here with richer semantic representations derived from massive image-text corpora. Additionally, extending IMRAM's capability to dynamically adjust the number of iterative steps based on dataset complexity could further enhance its adaptability and efficiency.

In conclusion, IMRAM represents a substantial innovation in cross-modal retrieval—demonstrating how iterative refinement and memory distillation can lead to nuanced alignments that capture the diverse semantic relationships between text and images. As the demand for intelligent retrieval systems grows, methods like IMRAM that simultaneously address scalability and real-world applicability are bound to become increasingly essential.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (6)
  1. Hui Chen (298 papers)
  2. Guiguang Ding (79 papers)
  3. Xudong Liu (41 papers)
  4. Zijia Lin (43 papers)
  5. Ji Liu (285 papers)
  6. Jungong Han (111 papers)
Citations (292)