Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
153 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

HPIPM: a high-performance quadratic programming framework for model predictive control (2003.02547v2)

Published 5 Mar 2020 in math.OC, cs.SY, and eess.SY

Abstract: This paper introduces HPIPM, a high-performance framework for quadratic programming (QP), designed to provide building blocks to efficiently and reliably solve model predictive control problems. HPIPM currently supports three QP types, and provides interior point method (IPM) solvers as well (partial) condensing routines. In particular, the IPM for optimal control QPs is intended to supersede the HPMPC solver, and it largely improves robustness while keeping the focus on speed. Numerical experiments show that HPIPM reliably solves challenging QPs, and that it outperforms other state-of-the-art solvers in speed.

Citations (191)

Summary

  • The paper introduces HPIPM, which leverages advanced interior point methods and efficient condensing routines to speed up MPC QP solutions.
  • It demonstrates superior computational performance against solvers like qpOASES and OSQP in handling dense, OCP, and tree-structured QPs.
  • The framework’s modular, user-friendly design facilitates integration and extension to complex control problems, including potential nonlinear applications.

Overview of HPIPM: A High-Performance QP Framework for Model Predictive Control

The paper "HPIPM: a high-performance quadratic programming framework for model predictive control" presents the development and evaluation of HPIPM, an innovative framework engineered to tackle model predictive control (MPC) challenges via high-performance quadratic programming (QP) solutions. The framework is crafted to provide robust, extendable, and efficient building blocks to solve these control problems with particular attention to speed and reliability.

Framework Capabilities and Design

HPIPM serves as a continuation and enhancement over the HPMPC solver, incorporating improved robustness while maintaining computational efficiency. It introduces several advancements, such as supporting a variety of QP types—dense QPs, optimal control problem (OCP) QPs, and tree-structured OCP QPs. The framework is equipped with sophisticated interior point method (IPM) solvers and versatile (partial) condensing routines, which address both primal and dual solution requirements in varying problem structures.

One of the standout features is its user-oriented design, encapsulating C structures to streamline user interactions through setters and getters. This greatly simplifies the manipulation and storage of problem data, enabling an efficient path toward handling different QP formulations. Furthermore, the modular framework design fosters the development of more generic algorithms, potentially extending towards nonlinear programming (NLP) solutions.

Numerical Efficiency and Robustness

The paper reveals through numerical experiments that HPIPM reliably handles challenging QPs and achieves superior computational speeds compared to other state-of-the-art solvers. The experimentation includes the evaluation against established solvers such as qpOASES and OSQP, particularly demonstrating HPIPM's prowess in embedded optimization settings.

HPIPM consistently outperforms its competitors in solving dense QPs and MPC-related OCP QPs, especially excelling in partially condensed formulations. This is attributed to its Riccati recursion-based KKT system solutions and condensing algorithms that exploit the problem's structure while minimizing computational overhead.

Algorithmic Developments

HPIPM offers multiple algorithmic formulations to cater to different performance needs, including delta and absolute formulations of the primal-dual IPM. Each approach provides specific trade-offs between speed and accuracy, with user-selectable modes (such as speed, balance, and robust) to optimize performance based on the problem context.

The iterative refinement and advanced KKT system-solving procedures address numerical precision, particularly in ill-conditioned systems or late IPM iterations. These enhancements demonstrate HPIPM's adaptability to a broad spectrum of problems with varying degrees of complexity.

Practical and Theoretical Implications

The introduction of HPIPM holds significant implications for the field of MPC. Practically, it reduces the computational burden in real-time applications, fostering advancements in areas such as robotics and automation. Theoretically, its structure-explicit design and factorization techniques present a template for future solver developments aimed at high-speed, reliable solutions for QP challenges.

Future Directions

The modularity of HPIPM inherently supports its extension to handle more complex scenarios, including non-linearities and constraints beyond traditional MPC applications. Upcoming research could focus on integrating more advanced machine learning techniques to predict optimal control strategies or enhance solver configurations based on real-time data streams.

In summary, HPIPM sets a robust foundation for contemporary and future studies in QP-based control problems, offering a scalable, efficient, and reliable framework well-suited for research and practical deployment in dynamic environments.