Image Matching across Wide Baselines: From Paper to Practice (2003.01587v5)

Abstract: We introduce a comprehensive benchmark for local features and robust estimation algorithms, focusing on the downstream task -- the accuracy of the reconstructed camera pose -- as our primary metric. Our pipeline's modular structure allows easy integration, configuration, and combination of different methods and heuristics. This is demonstrated by embedding dozens of popular algorithms and evaluating them, from seminal works to the cutting edge of machine learning research. We show that with proper settings, classical solutions may still outperform the perceived state of the art. Besides establishing the actual state of the art, the conducted experiments reveal unexpected properties of Structure from Motion (SfM) pipelines that can help improve their performance, for both algorithmic and learned methods. Data and code are online https://github.com/vcg-uvic/image-matching-benchmark, providing an easy-to-use and flexible framework for the benchmarking of local features and robust estimation methods, both alongside and against top-performing methods. This work provides a basis for the Image Matching Challenge https://vision.uvic.ca/image-matching-challenge.

Review of "LaTeX Author Guidelines for CVPR Proceedings"

The paper "LaTeX Author Guidelines for CVPR Proceedings" offers comprehensive and precise instructions for authors preparing manuscripts for submission to the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) conference. The paper is structured in a methodical manner to provide clarity on various formatting and procedural requirements necessary for adherence to CVPR standards.

Key Guidelines and Formatting Rules

The document details critical formatting requirements with precision, ensuring authors align their manuscripts with the conference’s specifications:

1. Manuscript Length: Papers are constrained to a maximum of eight pages, excluding references. This limitation underscores the importance of conciseness and precision in scientific writing while allowing authors to extend the reference section without page-count penalties.
2. Two-Column Layout: The manuscript must be formatted in a two-column layout with specified dimensions for text areas and margins. This layout is typical in conference publications, facilitating efficient utilization of space and ease of reading.
3. Typographical Specifications: Authors must use specific typestyles and fonts. For instance, the document’s main text should be in 10-point Times, consistent with standard academic and professional documents, ensuring uniformity and readability.
4. Structured Sections: The paper emphasizes structured scripting of documents, advising on the hierarchy and appearance of headings and maintaining consistent formatting throughout the manuscript.

Procedural and Ethical Considerations

The paper also brings to the forefront procedural considerations critical for manuscript submission:

• Blind Review: Guidance on preparing documents for blind review is provided, highlighting the necessity of removing personal identifiers but not witholding relevant citations from an author’s own previous work. This practice is essential for maintaining the integrity of the review process.
• Dual Submissions and Ethical Practices: The paper advises authors on dual submission policies and ethical practices regarding citations and the presentation of results in challenges, maintaining a standard aligned with academic integrity norms.

Practical Implications

The detailed instructions regarding graphical elements such as figures and tables ensure that papers not only adhere to style guidelines but also facilitate accessible and clear presentation of research results. For instance, authors are encouraged to match the font size in figures to the main text and use color judiciously, ensuring legibility in both digital and print formats.

Future Directions

While the paper outlines present guidelines, it implicitly sets a foundation for continual evaluation and evolution of these guidelines to keep pace with changing technologies and academic standards. The adaptability to new LaTeX packages, variations in academic writing structures, and the potential need for more dynamic document formats may be areas for future exploration.

In conclusion, the paper serves as an essential resource for authors intending to submit to CVPR, ensuring submissions are professionally executed to meet conference expectations. By enacting these guidelines meticulously, authors can better focus on the content and scientific contributions of their work, assured that their paper meets all necessary formatting and procedural standards.