Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
157 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
43 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

On Contrastive Learning for Likelihood-free Inference (2002.03712v2)

Published 10 Feb 2020 in stat.ML and cs.LG

Abstract: Likelihood-free methods perform parameter inference in stochastic simulator models where evaluating the likelihood is intractable but sampling synthetic data is possible. One class of methods for this likelihood-free problem uses a classifier to distinguish between pairs of parameter-observation samples generated using the simulator and pairs sampled from some reference distribution, which implicitly learns a density ratio proportional to the likelihood. Another popular class of methods fits a conditional distribution to the parameter posterior directly, and a particular recent variant allows for the use of flexible neural density estimators for this task. In this work, we show that both of these approaches can be unified under a general contrastive learning scheme, and clarify how they should be run and compared.

Citations (110)

Summary

  • The paper introduces a unified framework that bridges Sequential Ratio Estimation (SRE) and Sequential Neural Posterior Estimation (SNPE-C) using contrastive learning.
  • The paper demonstrates that increasing the contrast set size improves inference efficiency across simulators like Lotka-Volterra and M/G/1 queue.
  • The paper shows that SNPE-C outperforms SRE in high-dimensional posterior evaluations, offering faster and more reliable parameter inference.

On Contrastive Learning for Likelihood-free Inference

The paper presents a unified framework for likelihood-free inference using contrastive learning methods, offering significant insights into the convergence of classifier-based density ratio estimation and direct posterior estimation. The authors focus on stochastic simulator models where the likelihood function is intractable but synthetic data can be generated, a common setting in scientific and engineering domains. They propose a general contrastive learning scheme to integrate two prevalent approaches: Sequential Ratio Estimation (SRE) and Sequential Neural Posterior Estimation (SNPE-C).

The methodology leverages the ability of classification tasks to learn density ratios, facilitating parameter inference without the direct likelihood evaluation. Positive samples are drawn from joint distributions of parameter-observation pairs, while negative samples are assembled independently from marginal distributions. This approach recuperates density ratios proportional to the posterior likelihood, allowing the use of neural classifiers and density estimators.

The central contribution of the paper is the identification of a cohesive scheme that bridges classification-based density ratio estimation (SRE) with posterior density estimation (SNPE-C). By establishing that both methods are instances of contrastive learning, the authors propose a flexible algorithm, capable of using either feed-forward classifiers or neural density estimators. This flexibility underscores the algorithm's applicability in diverse scientific contexts where parameter inference is needed.

The paper demonstrates numerical experiments using popular simulators such as Nonlinear Gaussian, Lotka-Volterra, and M/G/1 queue models. The results indicate that increasing the size of the contrasting set improves inference efficiency. Moreover, SNPE-C tends to outperform SRE in several tasks, particularly where the posterior distribution must be evaluated across high-dimensional observation spaces. The experiments also highlight the advantages of SNPE-C in providing expedited, i.i.d. sampling from learned posteriors, despite challenges related to prior support mismatches.

Several practical implications arise from this research. Researchers can effectively choose between SRE and SNPE-C based on the problem context, exploiting SNPE-C when high-dimensional posterior evaluation is feasible. Additionally, the framework paves the way for using advanced neural density estimation techniques in likelihood-free settings. However, issues like unsuccessful simulation runs and prior support mismatches necessitate further methodological refinement.

Looking forward, the integration of contrastive learning paradigms in likelihood-free inference has the potential to influence advancements in machine learning and AI, particularly in applications requiring fast and robust parameter inference. The work encourages utilizing neural networks' flexibility and encourages examining sequential approaches where progressively better proposal distributions can be employed. Future developments may focus on optimizing these algorithms further and addressing open challenges in handling failed simulations and exploiting multiple observations adequately.

In summary, this paper contributes significantly to the understanding and application of contrastive learning techniques in likelihood-free inference, offering a comprehensive framework that accommodates varying scientific models and computational constraints. It serves as a pivotal step toward practical and scalable inference solutions, fostering further research into efficient simulation-based methods.

Github Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com