Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Actions as Moving Points (2001.04608v3)

Published 14 Jan 2020 in cs.CV

Abstract: The existing action tubelet detectors often depend on heuristic anchor design and placement, which might be computationally expensive and sub-optimal for precise localization. In this paper, we present a conceptually simple, computationally efficient, and more precise action tubelet detection framework, termed as MovingCenter Detector (MOC-detector), by treating an action instance as a trajectory of moving points. Based on the insight that movement information could simplify and assist action tubelet detection, our MOC-detector is composed of three crucial head branches: (1) Center Branch for instance center detection and action recognition, (2) Movement Branch for movement estimation at adjacent frames to form trajectories of moving points, (3) Box Branch for spatial extent detection by directly regressing bounding box size at each estimated center. These three branches work together to generate the tubelet detection results, which could be further linked to yield video-level tubes with a matching strategy. Our MOC-detector outperforms the existing state-of-the-art methods for both metrics of frame-mAP and video-mAP on the JHMDB and UCF101-24 datasets. The performance gap is more evident for higher video IoU, demonstrating that our MOC-detector is particularly effective for more precise action detection. We provide the code at https://github.com/MCG-NJU/MOC-Detector.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Yixuan Li (183 papers)
  2. Zixu Wang (26 papers)
  3. Limin Wang (221 papers)
  4. Gangshan Wu (70 papers)
Citations (96)

Summary

Actions as Moving Points: A Novel Framework for Action Tubelet Detection

The paper "Actions as Moving Points" introduces a novel framework for spatio-temporal action detection in videos, termed the MovingCenter Detector (MOC-detector). This framework proposes a significant departure from traditional methods by conceptualizing an action instance as a trajectory of moving points. This conceptual simplification not only enhances computational efficiency but also provides more precise results in detecting action tubelets.

Core Contributions and Methodology

The MOC-detector is architecturally notable for its three distinct head branches, each serving a specific purpose in action detection. These branches operate in a cohesive manner to produce high-quality tubelet detection results:

  1. Center Branch: This branch is dedicated to identifying the instance center and recognizing the action within the key frame. A center heatmap is generated using the extracted multi-frame feature maps, which assists in defining the action instance's central position.
  2. Movement Branch: Employing a different approach from traditional frame-by-frame detection, this branch estimates the movement trajectory of the action instance's center across successive frames. This is achieved using 3D convolutional operations that predict movements relative to the key frame.
  3. Box Branch: Responsible for estimating the bounding box size of the detected action instance on each frame. This component operates independently on each frame, emphasizing precise spatial localization.

The innovative aspect of the MOC-detector lies in its anchor-free detection approach, as opposed to relying on heuristic anchors which traditionally imposed computational and design complexities.

Experimental Validation

The MOC-detector's efficacy is validated against state-of-the-art methods using datasets like UCF101-24 and JHMDB. Notably, it achieves superior performance in terms of frame-mAP and video-mAP metrics compared to existing methods. The paper reports a substantial gain in performance, especially for high IoU thresholds, highlighting the framework's effectiveness in achieving precise action detection. For example, on the UCF101-24 dataset, the MOC-detector achieves a frame-mAP of 78.0% and a video-mAP of 28.3% at IoU thresholds of 0.5:0.95.

Implications and Future Directions

The proposed method's implications are twofold. Practically, the MOC-detector presents an efficient and robust solution for video-based action detection tasks, which are pivotal in applications such as video surveillance and automated video annotation. Theoretically, the framework sets a foundational shift towards leveraging movement information for reducing the complexity and increasing the accuracy of action detection.

Future work could include extending the method for longer-term temporal modeling and improving boundary detection for actions within videos. Such developments could further enhance the MOC-detector's capabilities, making it applicable to more complex videographic contexts.

In conclusion, the paper's introduction of the MOC-detector as an anchor-free, movement-based framework marks an instrumental advancement in the field of action detection. Through its innovative approach and validated performance metrics, it provides a promising direction for future research and application developments in spatio-temporal video analysis.

Github Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com