Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
126 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
47 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Counterexample: scale-free networked graphs with invariable diameter and density feature (2001.03525v2)

Published 2 Dec 2019 in cs.SI and physics.soc-ph

Abstract: Here, we propose a class of scale-free networks $G(t;m)$ with some intriguing properties, which can not be simultaneously held by all the theoretical models with power-law degree distribution in the existing literature, including (i) average degrees $\langle k\rangle$ of all the generated networks are no longer a constant in the limit of large graph size, implying that they are not sparse but dense, (ii) power-law parameters $\gamma$ of these networks are precisely calculated equal to $2$, as well (iii) their diameters $D$ are all an invariant in the growth process of models. While our models have deterministic structure with clustering coefficients equivalent to zero, we might be able to obtain various candidates with nonzero clustering coefficient based on original networks using some reasonable approaches, for instance, randomly adding some new edges under the premise of keeping the three important properties above unchanged. In addition, we study trapping problem on networks $G(t;m)$ and then obtain closed-form solution to mean hitting time $\langle \mathcal{H}\rangle_{t}$. As opposed to other previous models, our results show an unexpected phenomenon that the analytic value for $\langle \mathcal{H}\rangle_{t}$ is approximately close to the logarithm of vertex number of networks $G(t;m)$. From the theoretical point of view, these networked models considered here can be thought of as counterexamples for most of the published models obeying power-law distribution in current study.

Citations (8)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.