Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Enhancing streamflow forecast and extracting insights using long-short term memory networks with data integration at continental scales (1912.08949v3)

Published 18 Dec 2019 in cs.LG and stat.ML

Abstract: Recent observations with varied schedules and types (moving average, snapshot, or regularly spaced) can help to improve streamflow forecasts, but it is challenging to integrate them effectively. Based on a long short-term memory (LSTM) streamflow model, we tested multiple versions of a flexible procedure we call data integration (DI) to leverage recent discharge measurements to improve forecasts. DI accepts lagged inputs either directly or through a convolutional neural network (CNN) unit. DI ubiquitously elevated streamflow forecast performance to unseen levels, reaching a record continental-scale median Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency coefficient value of 0.86. Integrating moving-average discharge, discharge from the last few days, or even average discharge from the previous calendar month could all improve daily forecasts. Directly using lagged observations as inputs was comparable in performance to using the CNN unit. Importantly, we obtained valuable insights regarding hydrologic processes impacting LSTM and DI performance. Before applying DI, the base LSTM model worked well in mountainous or snow-dominated regions, but less well in regions with low discharge volumes (due to either low precipitation or high precipitation-energy synchronicity) and large inter-annual storage variability. DI was most beneficial in regions with high flow autocorrelation: it greatly reduced baseflow bias in groundwater-dominated western basins and also improved peak prediction for basins with dynamical surface water storage, such as the Prairie Potholes or Great Lakes regions. However, even DI cannot elevate high-aridity basins with one-day flash peaks. Despite this limitation, there is much promise for a deep-learning-based forecast paradigm due to its performance, automation, efficiency, and flexibility.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Dapeng Feng (12 papers)
  2. Kuai Fang (6 papers)
  3. Chaopeng Shen (22 papers)
Citations (232)

Summary

Streamflow Forecasting with LSTM and Data Integration

The paper "Enhancing streamflow forecast and extracting insights using long-short term memory networks with data integration at continental scales" investigates the utilization of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks for streamflow forecasting at continental scales. Recent advances in deep learning have enabled sophisticated time-series models like LSTM to offer flexibility and performance improvements in hydrologic predictions. This work explores the integration of diverse time-series data as inputs, highlighting a technique termed "data integration" (DI) to improve the predictive performance of LSTM models.

Methodology and Key Findings

The authors employ LSTM networks to forecast streamflow, leveraging recent observations of streamflow data. The DI approach allows these observations to be directly or indirectly inputted into the model via a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) unit. This methodology is compared against traditional hydrologic models, such as the Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting (SAC-SMA) model, in addition to simpler statistical methods like autoregressive (AR) models and artificial neural networks (ANNs).

Performance comparisons using the Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) coefficient reveal a significant advantage of DI methods, achieving a median NSE of 0.86. In contrast, baseline LSTM models without DI indicated a median NSE of 0.73, outperforming conventional models like SAC-SMA. DI's efficacy is particularly highlighted in regions with high autocorrelation in streamflow data, often characterized by substantial storage or baseflow contributions, such as the Prairie Potholes and Great Lakes regions. However, DI did not improve predictions in highly arid regions like southern Texas, where streamflow peaks are captured poorly due to their flashiness and are influenced by karstic hydrogeology.

Implications and Insights

The research implies several practical and theoretical implications. Practically, the ability of LSTM to incorporate various forms of discharge observations could redefine streamflow forecasting practices, offering improved predictive accuracy with minimal manual tuning of model parameters. Theoretically, this paper contributes insights into the relationships between streamflow dynamics and geophysical attributes, as well as the understanding of LSTM's applicability across different hydrologic contexts.

Another interesting aspect of the paper is its commentary on LSTM's ability to internalize hydrological processes previously requiring explicit modeling. The paper observes that LSTM networks, especially when utilizing DI, can capture and improve upon the streamflow estimate biases seen in traditional models. The practical implications are vast, encompassing potential applications in flood forecasting and water resource management amid escalating climate variability.

Future Directions

The authors suggest that extending this work could involve integrating additional data types such as soil moisture measurements or GRACE-based water storage anomalies. Further opportunities lie in enhancing LSTM architectures to better model streamflow generation processes and reducing computational costs while maintaining robustness.

Additionally, coupling the flexibility and power of LSTM with physically-based hydrologic models could offer hybrid solutions that leverage the strengths of both methodologies. Such combinations may lead to enhanced predictive performance in complex hydrological systems and could present a research avenue that bridges empirical and theoretical modeling frameworks.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this paper demonstrates the capabilities of LSTM networks augmented with DI for improved streamflow forecasting at continental scales. The methodology's applicability across varied hydrological landscapes hints at a broader potential for employing AI and machine learning in environmental modeling. Despite some challenges with specific regional conditions, this research lays a foundation for future developments in AI-driven hydrological forecasting, potentially leading to more reliable and accurate water resource management tools.