Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
80 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Potential of deep features for opinion-unaware, distortion-unaware, no-reference image quality assessment (1911.11903v1)

Published 27 Nov 2019 in eess.IV and cs.CV

Abstract: Image Quality Assessment algorithms predict a quality score for a pristine or distorted input image, such that it correlates with human opinion. Traditional methods required a non-distorted "reference" version of the input image to compare with, in order to predict this score. However, recent "No-reference" methods circumvent this requirement by modelling the distribution of clean image features, thereby making them more suitable for practical use. However, majority of such methods either use hand-crafted features or require training on human opinion scores (supervised learning), which are difficult to obtain and standardise. We explore the possibility of using deep features instead, particularly, the encoded (bottleneck) feature maps of a Convolutional Autoencoder neural network architecture. Also, we do not train the network on subjective scores (unsupervised learning). The primary requirements for an IQA method are monotonic increase in predicted scores with increasing degree of input image distortion, and consistent ranking of images with the same distortion type and content, but different distortion levels. Quantitative experiments using the Pearson, Kendall and Spearman correlation scores on a diverse set of images show that our proposed method meets the above requirements better than the state-of-art method (which uses hand-crafted features) for three types of distortions: blurring, noise and compression artefacts. This demonstrates the potential for future research in this relatively unexplored sub-area within IQA.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Subhayan Mukherjee (12 papers)
  2. Giuseppe Valenzise (23 papers)
  3. Irene Cheng (23 papers)
Citations (14)