Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
169 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A Quadratic Lower Bound for Algebraic Branching Programs and Formulas (1911.11793v2)

Published 26 Nov 2019 in cs.CC

Abstract: We show that any Algebraic Branching Program (ABP) computing the polynomial $\sum_{i = 1}n x_in$ has at least $\Omega(n2)$ vertices. This improves upon the lower bound of $\Omega(n\log n)$, which follows from the classical result of Baur and Strassen [Str73, BS83], and extends the results in [K19], which showed a quadratic lower bound for \emph{homogeneous} ABPs computing the same polynomial. Our proof relies on a notion of depth reduction which is reminiscent of similar statements in the context of matrix rigidity, and shows that any small enough ABP computing the polynomial $\sum_{i=1}n x_in$ can be depth reduced to essentially a homogeneous ABP of the same size which computes the polynomial $\sum_{i = 1}n x_in + \epsilon(x_1, \ldots, x_n)$, for a structured "error polynomial" $\epsilon(x_1, \ldots, x_n)$. To complete the proof, we then observe that the lower bound in [K19] is robust enough and continues to hold for all polynomials $\sum_{i = 1}n x_in + \epsilon(x_1, \ldots, x_n)$, where $\epsilon(x_1, \ldots, x_n)$ has the appropriate structure. We also use our ideas to show an $\Omega(n2)$ lower bound of the size of algebraic formulas computing the elementary symmetric polynomial of degree $0.1n$ on $n$ variables. This is a slight improvement upon the prior best known formula lower bound (proved for a different polynomial) of $\Omega(n2/\log n)$ [Nec66, K85, SY10]. Interestingly, this lower bound is asymptotically better than $n2/\log n$, the strongest lower bound that can be proved using previous methods. This lower bound also matches the upper bound, due to Ben-Or, who showed that elementary symmetric polynomials can be computed by algebraic formula (in fact depth-$3$ formula) of size $O(n2)$. Prior to this work, Ben-Or's construction was known to be optimal only for algebraic formulas of depth-$3$ [SW01].

Citations (16)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.