Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Creating Auxiliary Representations from Charge Definitions for Criminal Charge Prediction (1911.05202v1)

Published 12 Nov 2019 in cs.CL and cs.AI

Abstract: Charge prediction, determining charges for criminal cases by analyzing the textual fact descriptions, is a promising technology in legal assistant systems. In practice, the fact descriptions could exhibit a significant intra-class variation due to factors like non-normative use of language, which makes the prediction task very challenging, especially for charge classes with too few samples to cover the expression variation. In this work, we explore to use the charge definitions from criminal law to alleviate this issue. The key idea is that the expressions in a fact description should have corresponding formal terms in charge definitions, and those terms are shared across classes and could account for the diversity in the fact descriptions. Thus, we propose to create auxiliary fact representations from charge definitions to augment fact descriptions representation. The generated auxiliary representations are created through the interaction of fact description with the relevant charge definitions and terms in those definitions by integrated sentence- and word-level attention scheme. Experimental results on two datasets show that our model achieves significant improvement than baselines, especially for classes with few samples.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (5)
  1. Liangyi Kang (2 papers)
  2. Jie Liu (492 papers)
  3. Lingqiao Liu (114 papers)
  4. Qinfeng Shi (42 papers)
  5. Dan Ye (9 papers)
Citations (9)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.