Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Assisting human experts in the interpretation of their visual process: A case study on assessing copper surface adhesive potency (1910.11033v1)

Published 24 Oct 2019 in cs.CV and cs.LG

Abstract: Deep Neural Networks are often though to lack interpretability due to the distributed nature of their internal representations. In contrast, humans can generally justify, in natural language, for their answer to a visual question with simple common sense reasoning. However, human introspection abilities have their own limits as one often struggles to justify for the recognition process behind our lowest level feature recognition ability: for instance, it is difficult to precisely explain why a given texture seems more characteristic of the surface of a finger nail rather than a plastic bottle. In this paper, we showcase an application in which deep learning models can actually help human experts justify for their own low-level visual recognition process: We study the problem of assessing the adhesive potency of copper sheets from microscopic pictures of their surface. Although highly trained material experts are able to qualitatively assess the surface adhesive potency, they are often unable to precisely justify for their decision process. We present a model that, under careful design considerations, is able to provide visual clues for human experts to understand and justify for their own recognition process. Not only can our model assist human experts in their interpretation of the surface characteristics, we show how this model can be used to test different hypothesis of the copper surface response to different manufacturing processes.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (9)
  1. Tristan Hascoet (5 papers)
  2. Xuejiao Deng (2 papers)
  3. Kiyoto Tai (1 paper)
  4. Mari Sugiyama (1 paper)
  5. Yuji Adachi (2 papers)
  6. Sachiko Nakamura (8 papers)
  7. Yasuo Ariki (4 papers)
  8. Tomoko Hayashi (1 paper)
  9. Tetusya Takiguchi (1 paper)
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.