Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Co-citations in context: disciplinary heterogeneity is relevant (1909.08738v1)

Published 18 Sep 2019 in cs.DL

Abstract: Citation analysis of the scientific literature has been used to study and define disciplinary boundaries, to trace the dissemination of knowledge, and to estimate impact. Co-citation, the frequency with which pairs of publications are cited, provides insight into how documents relate to each other and across fields. Co-citation analysis has been used to characterize combinations of prior work as conventional or innovative and to derive features of highly cited publications. Given the organization of science into disciplines, a key question is the sensitivity of such analyses to frame of reference. Our study examines this question using semantically-themed citation networks. We observe that trends reported to be true across the scientific literature do not hold for focused citation networks, and we conclude that inferring novelty using co-citation analysis and random graph models benefits from disciplinary context.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (8)
  1. James Bradley (4 papers)
  2. Sitaram Devarakonda (4 papers)
  3. Avon Davey (1 paper)
  4. Dmitriy Korobskiy (6 papers)
  5. Siyu Liu (45 papers)
  6. Djamil Lakhdar-Hamina (2 papers)
  7. Tandy Warnow (22 papers)
  8. George Chacko (15 papers)
Citations (11)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.