Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Deep Esophageal Clinical Target Volume Delineation using Encoded 3D Spatial Context of Tumors, Lymph Nodes, and Organs At Risk (1909.01526v2)

Published 4 Sep 2019 in eess.IV and cs.CV

Abstract: Clinical target volume (CTV) delineation from radiotherapy computed tomography (RTCT) images is used to define the treatment areas containing the gross tumor volume (GTV) and/or sub-clinical malignant disease for radiotherapy (RT). High intra- and inter-user variability makes this a particularly difficult task for esophageal cancer. This motivates automated solutions, which is the aim of our work. Because CTV delineation is highly context-dependent--it must encompass the GTV and regional lymph nodes (LNs) while also avoiding excessive exposure to the organs at risk (OARs)--we formulate it as a deep contextual appearance-based problem using encoded spatial contexts of these anatomical structures. This allows the deep network to better learn from and emulate the margin- and appearance-based delineation performed by human physicians. Additionally, we develop domain-specific data augmentation to inject robustness to our system. Finally, we show that a simple 3D progressive holistically nested network (PHNN), which avoids computationally heavy decoding paths while still aggregating features at different levels of context, can outperform more complicated networks. Cross-validated experiments on a dataset of 135 esophageal cancer patients demonstrate that our encoded spatial context approach can produce concrete performance improvements, with an average Dice score of 83.9% and an average surface distance of 4.2 mm, representing improvements of 3.8% and 2.4 mm, respectively, over the state-of-the-art approach.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (7)
  1. Dakai Jin (41 papers)
  2. Dazhou Guo (23 papers)
  3. Tsung-Ying Ho (12 papers)
  4. Adam P. Harrison (45 papers)
  5. Jing Xiao (267 papers)
  6. Chen-kan Tseng (4 papers)
  7. Le Lu (148 papers)
Citations (21)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.