Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
102 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Federated Learning for Wireless Communications: Motivation, Opportunities and Challenges (1908.06847v4)

Published 30 Jul 2019 in eess.SP, cs.LG, and stat.ML

Abstract: There is a growing interest in the wireless communications community to complement the traditional model-based design approaches with data-driven ML-based solutions. While conventional ML approaches rely on the assumption of having the data and processing heads in a central entity, this is not always feasible in wireless communications applications because of the inaccessibility of private data and large communication overhead required to transmit raw data to central ML processors. As a result, decentralized ML approaches that keep the data where it is generated are much more appealing. Owing to its privacy-preserving nature, federated learning is particularly relevant for many wireless applications, especially in the context of fifth generation (5G) networks. In this article, we provide an accessible introduction to the general idea of federated learning, discuss several possible applications in 5G networks, and describe key technical challenges and open problems for future research on federated learning in the context of wireless communications.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Solmaz Niknam (12 papers)
  2. Harpreet S. Dhillon (156 papers)
  3. Jeffery H. Reed (5 papers)
Citations (552)

Summary

Federated Learning in Wireless Communications: Key Insights and Challenges

The paper by Niknam, Dhillon, and Reed presents a thorough examination of federated learning (FL) in the context of wireless communications, emphasizing its foundational motivations, potential applications, and the challenges it faces. The authors argue that federated learning presents a decentralized ML approach that is particularly suitable for wireless networks due to its inherent advantages in handling decentralized data and preserving user privacy.

Motivation and Context

With the increasing complexity and heterogeneity in modern wireless networks, traditional model-driven communication system designs, which rely heavily on centralized data processing, are becoming inadequate. This inadequacy stems from substantial communication overheads and privacy concerns associated with transmitting raw data for centralized processing. Consequently, decentralized methodologies like FL, which perform local training on data generated at the edge, are gaining traction. Federated learning involves aggregating only model parameters at a central node, maintaining data privacy and reducing communication costs, which is essential for latency-sensitive applications.

Highlights of Federated Learning

Federated learning's primary advantage in wireless communications is its ability to train models locally, thereby avoiding the potentially prohibitive costs associated with transmitting raw data to a central processor. This paradigm shift aligns well with the capabilities of modern edge devices equipped with substantial processing power, such as TrueNorth and Snapdragon neural processors. The paper explores the distinctiveness of federated learning vis-à-vis conventional distributed and parallel learning frameworks, particularly in dealing with non-i.i.d., unbalanced, and massively distributed datasets.

Applications in Wireless Communications

The authors explore various applications of FL in the domain of wireless networks:

  1. Edge Computing and Caching: FL offers a means to predict content popularity at the network's edge, facilitating low-latency applications like augmented reality (AR). By collaboratively learning user preferences without accessing private data directly, edge caches can proactively store relevant content, improving user experience.
  2. Spectrum Management: The decentralized nature of FL fits well with the requirements of dynamic spectrum sharing. Radios can collaboratively learn spectrum utilization patterns without revealing sensitive operational data, supporting both spectrum access optimization and coexistence of heterogeneous systems such as DSRC and c-V2X.
  3. 5G Core Networks: In the 5G core architecture, FL can be employed to process vertically fragmented datasets across network functions, thereby enhancing security and reducing the vulnerabilities introduced through network function virtualization.

Challenges and Future Directions

The paper identifies several challenges in implementing FL within wireless networks:

  • Privacy and Security: While FL inherently preserves privacy by keeping data local, additional layers of security such as secure aggregation and differentially private algorithms are necessary. However, these often come at the cost of model performance or computational overhead.
  • Algorithmic Challenges: Ensuring convergence of federated algorithms under resource constraints remains a significant hurdle. The authors call for further theoretical assessments of performance bounds, especially concerning non-convex loss functions common in deep learning models.
  • Wireless Considerations: The quantization of model parameters for transmission over wireless channels introduces potential inaccuracies due to quantization errors, noise, and interference. Techniques that ensure model robustness to these factors are critical.

Conclusion

Federated learning offers promising solutions to some of wireless communications' most pressing challenges, such as privacy, latency, and resource management. By enabling decentralized model training, FL can improve the efficacy of 5G networks across various applications. Nonetheless, numerous open challenges, particularly concerning security, algorithmic efficiency, and adaptation to wireless contexts, necessitate continued research. This paper lays a foundational understanding for these future explorations.