Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Constant Girth Approximation for Directed Graphs in Subquadratic Time (1907.10779v2)

Published 25 Jul 2019 in cs.DS

Abstract: In this paper we provide a $\tilde{O}(m\sqrt{n})$ time algorithm that computes a $3$-multiplicative approximation of the girth of a $n$-node $m$-edge directed graph with non-negative edge lengths. This is the first algorithm which approximates the girth of a directed graph up to a constant multiplicative factor faster than All-Pairs Shortest Paths (APSP) time, i.e. $O(mn)$. Additionally, for any integer $k \ge 1$, we provide a deterministic algorithm for a $O(k\log\log n)$-multiplicative approximation to the girth in directed graphs in $\tilde{O}(m{1+1/k})$ time. Combining the techniques from these two results gives us an algorithm for a $O(k\log k)$-multiplicative approximation to the girth in directed graphs in $\tilde{O}(m{1+1/k})$ time. Our results naturally also provide algorithms for improved constructions of roundtrip spanners, the analog of spanners in directed graphs. The previous fastest algorithms for these problems either ran in All-Pairs Shortest Paths (APSP) time, i.e. $O(mn)$, or were due Pachocki et al. (PRSTV18) which provided a randomized algorithm that for any integer $k \ge 1$ in time $\tilde{O}(m{1+1/k})$ computed with high probability a $O(k\log n)$ multiplicative approximation of the girth. Our first algorithm constitutes the first sub-APSP-time algorithm for approximating the girth to constant accuracy, our second removes the need for randomness and improves the approximation factor in Pachocki et al. (PRSTV18), and our third is the first time versus quality trade-off for obtaining constant approximations.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Shiri Chechik (25 papers)
  2. Yang P. Liu (43 papers)
  3. Omer Rotem (1 paper)
  4. Aaron Sidford (122 papers)
Citations (6)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.