Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

XRAI: Better Attributions Through Regions (1906.02825v2)

Published 6 Jun 2019 in cs.CV and stat.ML

Abstract: Saliency methods can aid understanding of deep neural networks. Recent years have witnessed many improvements to saliency methods, as well as new ways for evaluating them. In this paper, we 1) present a novel region-based attribution method, XRAI, that builds upon integrated gradients (Sundararajan et al. 2017), 2) introduce evaluation methods for empirically assessing the quality of image-based saliency maps (Performance Information Curves (PICs)), and 3) contribute an axiom-based sanity check for attribution methods. Through empirical experiments and example results, we show that XRAI produces better results than other saliency methods for common models and the ImageNet dataset.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Andrei Kapishnikov (5 papers)
  2. Tolga Bolukbasi (20 papers)
  3. Fernanda Viégas (23 papers)
  4. Michael Terry (25 papers)
Citations (196)

Summary

  • The paper introduces XRAI, a region-based attribution technique that aggregates pixel-level contributions into coherent segments to improve model interpretability.
  • It employs over-segmentation and merging strategies for generating high-quality saliency maps, demonstrating superior performance on ImageNet compared to traditional methods.
  • The method is validated with novel evaluation metrics like Accuracy Information Curves and a perturbation-based sanity check, ensuring robust attribution outputs.

An Overview of XRAI: Region-Based Attribution Method for Neural Networks

The research paper titled "XRAI: Better Attributions Through Regions" introduces an innovative approach to enhancing the understanding of deep neural networks (DNNs) through a region-based attribution method known as XRAI. This method is designed to improve the identification of input features that influence a DNN's predictions, thus offering insights into model behavior and aiding in areas like model debugging and fairness verification. The paper's significant contributions include the presentation of XRAI, an assessment framework using Performance Information Curves (PICs) for evaluating saliency maps, and the introduction of a perturbation-based sanity check for attribution methods.

Introduction to Saliency Methods and Their Enhancement

Saliency methods, as discussed in the paper, are crucial tools that link the predictions of a DNN to specific input features that influence these predictions. The limitation of traditional pixel-based methods often lies in their failure to reliably identify salient inputs or produce results that correspond closely to a model's learned parameters. To address these challenges, XRAI extends the Integrated Gradients (IG) technique by employing image segmentation strategies to focus on regional attributions rather than individual pixels.

XRAI Methodology

XRAI innovatively uses over-segmentation techniques to create multiple regions within an image. This approach allows for the aggregation of pixel-level attributions into coherent segments, which in turn provides a more robust understanding of which image regions are critical for model predictions. By implementing a merging strategy based on attribution scores, XRAI effectively coalesces smaller segments into larger, meaningful regions. This process creates a saliency map that better reflects important areas within an image as judged by their contribution to the model's output. An empirical evaluation on ImageNet datasets demonstrates that XRAI's saliency regions, when compared to existing methods, are of higher quality and provide tighter bounding around objects of interest.

Evaluation Metrics

The paper introduces two new metrics, Accuracy Information Curves (AICs) and Softmax Information Curves (SICs), for assessing the quality of saliency maps. These metrics follow the curve-based evaluation approach akin to ROC curves, leveraging notions such as entropy and the bokeh effect from photography. By progressively sharpening important regions in a blurred image and evaluating the model's performance, these metrics offer a quantitative basis for comparing different saliency methods.

Sanity Checks and Method Validation

To ensure the reliability and validity of saliency methods, the authors propose a perturbation-based sanity check. This check, rooted in the Perturbation-ε Axiom, ensures that changes in model predictions due to feature alterations are captured meaningfully by the saliency outputs. Through experimentation, the paper reveals the limitations of existing methods, such as Integrated Gradients, which can sometimes exhibit unreliable pixel-level attributions. XRAI, by focusing on aggregated regions, shows enhanced robustness against such perturbations and passes additional sanity checks better than its counterparts.

Implications and Future Prospects

The development of XRAI represents a substantial step forward in the field of explainability for neural networks. By improving the attribution quality and introducing robust evaluation metrics, XRAI aids in unlocking black-box models, potentially leading to broader applications in areas requiring high levels of model interpretability. Future research could explore the application of XRAI in various domains beyond traditional image datasets, such as video processing or medical image diagnosis. Additionally, enhancements in image segmentation techniques could further refine region-based attribution methods, improving both the granularity and the coherence of saliency maps.

In conclusion, the paper "XRAI: Better Attributions Through Regions" addresses key challenges in neural network interpretability by introducing a novel region-based approach, rigorous evaluation metrics, and a comprehensive validation framework, setting a precedent for future work in the field of interpretable AI.