Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
173 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Absence of chiral symmetry breaking in Thirring models in 1+2 dimensions (1905.00137v2)

Published 30 Apr 2019 in hep-lat and cond-mat.str-el

Abstract: The Thirring model is an interacting fermion theory with current-current interaction. The model in $1+2$ dimensions has applications in condensed-matter physics to describe the electronic excitations of Dirac materials. Earlier investigations with Schwinger-Dyson equations, the functional renormalization group and lattice simulations with staggered fermions suggest that a critical number of (reducible) flavors $N{\mathrm{c}}$ exists, below which chiral symmetry can be broken spontaneously. Values for $N{\mathrm{c}}$ found in the literature vary between $2$ and $7$. Recent lattice studies with chirally invariant SLAC fermions have indicated that chiral symmetry is unbroken for all integer flavor numbers [Wellegehausen et al., 2017]. An independent simulation based on domain wall fermions seems to favor a critical flavor-number that satisfies $1<N^{\mathrm{c}}\<2$ [Hands, 2018]. However, in the latter simulations difficulties in reaching the massless limit in the broken phase (at strong coupling and after the $L_s\to\infty$ limit has been taken) are encountered. To find an accurate value $N^{\mathrm{c}}$ we study the Thirring model (by using an analytic continuation of the parity even theory to arbitrary real $N$) for $N$ between $0.5$ and $1.1$. We investigate the chiral condensate, the spectral density of the Dirac operator, the spectrum of (would-be) Goldstone bosons and the variation of the filling-factor and conclude that the critical flavor number is $N^{\mathrm{c}}=0.80(4)$. Thus we see no chiral symmetry breaking in all Thirring models with $1$ or more flavors of ($4$-component) fermions. Besides the artifact transition to the unphysical lattice artifact phase we find strong evidence for a hitherto unknown phase transition that exists for $N>N{\mathrm{c}}$ and should answer the question of where to construct a continuum limit.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.