Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
110 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

STGAN: A Unified Selective Transfer Network for Arbitrary Image Attribute Editing (1904.09709v1)

Published 22 Apr 2019 in cs.CV

Abstract: Arbitrary attribute editing generally can be tackled by incorporating encoder-decoder and generative adversarial networks. However, the bottleneck layer in encoder-decoder usually gives rise to blurry and low quality editing result. And adding skip connections improves image quality at the cost of weakened attribute manipulation ability. Moreover, existing methods exploit target attribute vector to guide the flexible translation to desired target domain. In this work, we suggest to address these issues from selective transfer perspective. Considering that specific editing task is certainly only related to the changed attributes instead of all target attributes, our model selectively takes the difference between target and source attribute vectors as input. Furthermore, selective transfer units are incorporated with encoder-decoder to adaptively select and modify encoder feature for enhanced attribute editing. Experiments show that our method (i.e., STGAN) simultaneously improves attribute manipulation accuracy as well as perception quality, and performs favorably against state-of-the-arts in arbitrary facial attribute editing and season translation.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (7)
  1. Ming Liu (421 papers)
  2. Yukang Ding (9 papers)
  3. Min Xia (12 papers)
  4. Xiao Liu (402 papers)
  5. Errui Ding (156 papers)
  6. Wangmeng Zuo (279 papers)
  7. Shilei Wen (42 papers)
Citations (309)

Summary

Analyzing "STGAN: A Unified Selective Transfer Network for Arbitrary Image Attribute Editing"

This paper introduces a method called STGAN, aiming to enhance the capabilities of arbitrary image attribute editing through a novel approach. By incorporating a difference-based attribute vector and selective transfer units (STUs) within an encoder-decoder framework, STGAN seeks to improve both the perceptual quality and manipulation accuracy of attribute-editing tasks.

Summary of Methods and Approach

The proposed STGAN model addresses the limits encountered by traditional encoder-decoder frameworks and generative adversarial networks (GANs) in image attribute editing tasks. Conventional methods, like AttGAN and StarGAN, utilize the complete target attribute vector, which can lead to unnecessary alterations in irrelevant features. STGAN reduces this redundancy by employing a difference attribute vector, which focuses only on the attributes requiring modification. This approach alleviates the cognitive load during training and enhances the precision of attribute transformations.

STGAN further refines the encoder-decoder architecture by introducing Selective Transfer Units (STUs). These units opt to adaptively modify encoder features, providing more flexible and effective manipulation of image attributes. STGAN leverages the selective nature of STUs to bridge layers, allowing for task-adaptive editing and fine-grained control across different image features. This design choice markedly improves attribute manipulation without degrading the quality of generated images.

Numerical Results and Performance

The empirical evaluations of STGAN as reported in the paper demonstrate substantial improvements over existing methods such as IcGAN, FaderNet, AttGAN, and StarGAN. In quantitative terms, STGAN records a PSNR above 31 and an SSIM of 0.948 in reconstruction tasks—considerably outperforming competitors. Additionally, user studies indicate that STGAN garners a higher preference rate across multiple attribute manipulation tasks, showcasing its superiority in maintaining visual fidelity and accurately editing specific attributes.

Another noteworthy comparison involves season translation tasks, where STGAN outperforms AttGAN, StarGAN, and even specialized models like CycleGAN. This model's robustness across distinct datasets and tasks suggests its effectiveness as a generalized framework for comprehensive image attribute modification.

Theoretical Implications and Future Directions

By successfully integrating selective feature manipulation with a more targeted approach to attribute input, STGAN highlights a promising direction in the development of more efficient and accurate image editing models. This selective transfer perspective not only reduces the computational burden but also advances the interpretability of transformations by emphasizing only the essential changes.

Future research might explore extending STGAN's selective transfer concepts to other domains of conditional image generation or further optimizing the design of STUs for even more refined control. Exploring the theoretical underpinnings of selective feature transfer could offer insights into other complex tasks requiring adaptable transformation models.

Overall, STGAN presents a solid contribution to the field of image processing, providing foundations for models that aspire for both nuance in edits and integrity in the original image, setting the stage for continued advancements in smart and efficient image attribute manipulation.