Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Relational Knowledge Distillation (1904.05068v2)

Published 10 Apr 2019 in cs.CV and cs.LG

Abstract: Knowledge distillation aims at transferring knowledge acquired in one model (a teacher) to another model (a student) that is typically smaller. Previous approaches can be expressed as a form of training the student to mimic output activations of individual data examples represented by the teacher. We introduce a novel approach, dubbed relational knowledge distillation (RKD), that transfers mutual relations of data examples instead. For concrete realizations of RKD, we propose distance-wise and angle-wise distillation losses that penalize structural differences in relations. Experiments conducted on different tasks show that the proposed method improves educated student models with a significant margin. In particular for metric learning, it allows students to outperform their teachers' performance, achieving the state of the arts on standard benchmark datasets.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Wonpyo Park (14 papers)
  2. Dongju Kim (1 paper)
  3. Yan Lu (179 papers)
  4. Minsu Cho (105 papers)
Citations (1,274)

Summary

Relational Knowledge Distillation

The paper "Relational Knowledge Distillation" by Wonpyo Park, Dongju Kim, Yan Lu, and Minsu Cho addresses the efficient transfer of knowledge from larger, complex neural networks (teachers) to smaller, more efficient networks (students). Unlike traditional Knowledge Distillation (KD) methods, which focus on directly mimicking the outputs of teachers, this paper emphasizes the transfer of relational knowledge among data samples, hence termed Relational Knowledge Distillation (RKD).

Overview of Relational Knowledge Distillation

Knowledge distillation methods have historically aimed at achieving models with reduced computational complexity by guiding smaller models to replicate the behaviors of larger models. Conventional methods typically achieve this by transferring knowledge through individual example-wise outputs, such as logits or soft labels. However, these methods often overlook the structural relationships embedded within the data's representation space, which can be crucial for the student's learning process.

The core contribution of this paper is the introduction of Relational Knowledge Distillation (RKD), a novel framework which transfers the relational structure of the embedding space learned by the teacher to the student. The method specifically defines relations via two metrics: distance and angle:

  1. Distance-wise Distillation Loss (RKD-D): This loss function penalizes discrepancies between the Euclidean distances of data point pairs in the teacher and student embeddings.
  2. Angle-wise Distillation Loss (RKD-A): This loss function penalizes differences in the angular relationships (defined by the cosine of the angle) among triplets of data points in the teacher and student embeddings.

Empirical Evaluation

The efficacy of RKD is substantiated through extensive experiments on various tasks including metric learning, image classification, and few-shot learning.

Metric Learning

Through the evaluation on image retrieval datasets such as CUB-200-2011, Cars 196, and Stanford Online Products, RKD demonstrates significant improvements over baseline triplet losses, conventional KD methods like Hinton’s KD, FitNet, and attention transfer. Notably, on the Cars 196 dataset, smaller student networks trained with RKD not only surpassed the baseline models but also performed better than their teachers, a phenomenon indicative of the richness of relational knowledge. For example, a ResNet18 with 128-dimensional embedding trained using RKD-DA achieved a recall@1 score of 82.50%, compared to 77.17% by its ResNet50-512 teacher.

Classification Tasks

RKD was also evaluated on CIFAR-100 and Tiny ImageNet datasets, where the student models achieved higher accuracy when guided by RKD compared to other KD methods. Furthermore, the paper demonstrates that RKD can be effectively combined with other KD methods like Hinton’s KD and attention-based distillation to yield even better performance, highlighting the complementary nature of relational knowledge and conventional distillation mechanisms.

Few-Shot Learning

In the context of few-shot learning, RKD was tested using Prototypical Networks on Omniglot and miniImageNet. The results indicated substantial improvements in few-shot classification accuracy, once again showcasing the efficacy of relational knowledge transfer in scenarios with limited data.

Implications and Future Directions

The introduction of RKD underscores the importance of considering higher-order relational structures in neural network distillation. The paper's results suggest that relational knowledge encapsulated in the distances and angles among embeddings is a potent source of information for training student networks. This insight opens several avenues for future research:

  1. Higher-Order Structural Relations: Exploration of more complex relational structures or higher-order potential functions, beyond pairwise distances and angles, could potentially capture more intricate relationships within the data.
  2. Task-Specific Distillation Losses: Development of task-specific RKD losses that could cater to specialized tasks such as object detection, LLMing, and more.
  3. Efficient RKD Implementations: Optimization of computational efficiencies in RKD, especially for high-dimensional data and complex models, to make the approach more scalable.

In conclusion, Relational Knowledge Distillation represents a significant advancement in the field of model compression and efficiency. By leveraging the relational structures within data, RKD not only enhances the performance and generalization capabilities of smaller models but also provides a framework for further exploring the depths of knowledge transfer in neural networks.