Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A comparative study of physics-informed neural network models for learning unknown dynamics and constitutive relations (1904.04058v1)

Published 2 Apr 2019 in cs.LG, cs.NA, math.DS, math.NA, and physics.comp-ph

Abstract: We investigate the use of discrete and continuous versions of physics-informed neural network methods for learning unknown dynamics or constitutive relations of a dynamical system. For the case of unknown dynamics, we represent all the dynamics with a deep neural network (DNN). When the dynamics of the system are known up to the specification of constitutive relations (that can depend on the state of the system), we represent these constitutive relations with a DNN. The discrete versions combine classical multistep discretization methods for dynamical systems with neural network based machine learning methods. On the other hand, the continuous versions utilize deep neural networks to minimize the residual function for the continuous governing equations. We use the case of a fedbatch bioreactor system to study the effectiveness of these approaches and discuss conditions for their applicability. Our results indicate that the accuracy of the trained neural network models is much higher for the cases where we only have to learn a constitutive relation instead of the whole dynamics. This finding corroborates the well-known fact from scientific computing that building as much structural information is available into an algorithm can enhance its efficiency and/or accuracy.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Ramakrishna Tipireddy (14 papers)
  2. Paris Perdikaris (61 papers)
  3. Panos Stinis (51 papers)
  4. Alexandre Tartakovsky (19 papers)
Citations (34)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.