Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Arabic natural language processing: An overview (1903.02784v1)

Published 7 Mar 2019 in cs.CL

Abstract: Arabic is recognised as the 4th most used language of the Internet. Arabic has three main varieties: (1) classical Arabic (CA), (2) Modern Standard Arabic (MSA), (3) Arabic Dialect (AD). MSA and AD could be written either in Arabic or in Roman script (Arabizi), which corresponds to Arabic written with Latin letters, numerals and punctuation. Due to the complexity of this language and the number of corresponding challenges for NLP, many surveys have been conducted, in order to synthesise the work done on Arabic. However these surveys principally focus on two varieties of Arabic (MSA and AD, written in Arabic letters only), they are slightly old (no such survey since 2015) and therefore do not cover recent resources and tools. To bridge the gap, we propose a survey focusing on 90 recent research papers (74% of which were published after 2015). Our study presents and classifies the work done on the three varieties of Arabic, by concentrating on both Arabic and Arabizi, and associates each work to its publicly available resources whenever available.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (5)
  1. Imane Guellil (6 papers)
  2. Houda Saâdane (2 papers)
  3. Faical Azouaou (8 papers)
  4. Billel Gueni (1 paper)
  5. Damien Nouvel (2 papers)
Citations (160)

Summary

Overview of "Arabic Natural Language Processing: An Overview"

The paper "Arabic Natural Language Processing: An Overview" by Imane Guellil et al. is a comprehensive survey of recent advancements in Arabic Natural Language Processing (ANLP). The survey analyzes and classifies 90 research studies spanning from 2015 to 2018, providing an extensive review of the developments in various aspects of ANLP regarding different types of Arabic language variants: Classical Arabic (CA), Modern Standard Arabic (MSA), Arabic Dialects (AD), and Arabizi, a non-standard romanization of Arabic.

Key Contributions and Findings

The paper identifies significant efforts in ANLP and categorizes them into four main research areas: Basic Language Analyses (BLA), Building Resources (BR), Language Identification (LI), and Semantic-Level Analysis (SemA). Key contributions include:

  1. Basic Language Analyses (BLA): This aspect focuses on morphological, orthographic, and syntactic analysis. The paper reviews advancements such as Farasa, an Arabic segmenter, and YAMAMA, a morphological analyzer, alongside efforts to address the complexities of Arabic dialects through tools like Salloum and Habash's ADAM.
  2. Building Resources (BR): The survey highlights the creation of extensive resources, lexicons, and corpora necessary for NLP tasks. Resources like the TALAA corpus for MSA and PADIC, a dialectal corpus, are examined. The paper stresses the importance of manual and automated resource-building, noting that the majority of these resources are manually constructed and require significant effort.
  3. Language Identification (LI): Various works on the identification of Arabic dialects and differentiating them from MSA are reviewed. Approaches range from rule-based to machine learning techniques, such as using neural networks for distinguishing between dialects.
  4. Semantic-Level Analysis (SemA): The overview includes works on sentiment analysis, machine translation, and other NLP applications. Methods like using sentiment lexicons for analysis and employing neural networks for sentiment classification are discussed.

Implications and Future Directions

The survey underscores an observable trend where the majority of research is skewed towards dialectal Arabic processing, with fewer but emerging studies focusing on Arabizi. It points to a growing body of work on multi-dialect processing, particularly in Gulf and Egyptian dialects, while noting the relative scarcity of work in North African dialects like Algerian, Tunisian, and Moroccan.

The paper suggests several open questions and areas for future research, emphasizing the need for:

  • Methods to automatically build resources to reduce time and effort.
  • Analysis of whether transliteration is necessary for semantic processing.
  • Approaches to handling dialects individually versus collectively.
  • Investigation into the utility of deep learning methods compared to traditional techniques like SVMs in ANLP.

The work stimulates discussion on leveraging existing resources and the potential for collaborative multi-lingual dialect studies. It also indicates the importance of making resources publicly available to aid in broadening the scope of ANLP research.

Conclusion

This survey serves as a crucial reference for researchers interested in ANLP, providing them with a curated list of significant works, tools, and resources available up to 2018. It effectively outlines the challenges and opportunities within the field, encouraging further exploration and resource-sharing in Arabic NLP. The paper concludes with a call to action for more comprehensive resource development, especially in underrepresented dialects and areas like Arabizi, which remain nascent in their research lifecycle.