Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
169 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Explicit Polar Codes with Small Scaling Exponent (1901.08186v3)

Published 24 Jan 2019 in cs.IT and math.IT

Abstract: Herein, we focus on explicit constructions of $\ell\times\ell$ binary kernels with small scaling exponent for $\ell \le 64$. In particular, we exhibit a sequence of binary linear codes that approaches capacity on the BEC with quasi-linear complexity and scaling exponent $\mu < 3$. To the best of our knowledge, such a sequence of codes was not previously known to exist. The principal challenges in establishing our results are twofold: how to construct such kernels and how to evaluate their scaling exponent. In a single polarization step, an $\ell\times\ell$ kernel $K_\ell$ transforms an underlying BEC into $\ell$ bit-channels $W_1,W_2,\ldots,W_\ell$. The erasure probabilities of $W_1,W_2,\ldots,W_\ell$, known as the polarization behavior of $K_\ell$, determine the resulting scaling exponent $\mu(K_\ell)$. We first introduce a class of self-dual binary kernels and prove that their polarization behavior satisfies a strong symmetry property. This reduces the problem of constructing $K_\ell$ to that of producing a certain nested chain of only $\ell/2$ self-orthogonal codes. We use nested cyclic codes, whose distance is as high as possible subject to the orthogonality constraint, to construct the kernels $K_{32}$ and $K_{64}$. In order to evaluate the polarization behavior of $K_{32}$ and $K_{64}$, two alternative trellis representations (which may be of independent interest) are proposed. Using the resulting trellises, we show that $\mu(K_{32})=3.122$ and explicitly compute over half of the polarization behavior coefficients for $K_{64}$, at which point the complexity becomes prohibitive. To complete the computation, we introduce a Monte-Carlo interpolation method, which produces the estimate $\mu(K_{64})\simeq 2.87$. We augment this estimate with a rigorous proof that $\mu(K_{64})<2.97$.

Citations (21)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.