Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
158 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A New Design of Private Information Retrieval for Storage Constrained Databases (1901.07490v1)

Published 22 Jan 2019 in cs.IT and math.IT

Abstract: Private information retrieval (PIR) allows a user to download one of $K$ messages from $N$ databases without revealing to any database which of the $K$ messages is being downloaded. In general, the databases can be storage constrained where each database can only store up to $\mu K L$ bits where $\frac{1}{N} \leq \mu \leq 1$ and $L$ is the size of each message in bits. Let $t= \mu N$, a recent work showed that the capacity of Storage Constrained PIR (SC-PIR) is $\left( 1+ \frac{1}{t} + \frac{1}{t2} + \cdots + \frac{1}{t{K-1}} \right){-1}$, which is achieved by a storage placement scheme inspired by the content placement scheme in the literature of coded caching and the original PIR scheme. Not surprisingly, this achievable scheme requires that each message is $L = {N \choose t}tK$ bits in length, which can be impractical. In this paper, without trying to make the connection between SC-PIR and coded caching problems, based on a general connection between the Full Storage PIR (FS-PIR) problem ($\mu = 1$) and SC-PIR problem, we propose a new SC-PIR design idea using novel storage placement schemes. The proposed schemes significantly reduce the message size requirement while still meeting the capacity of SC-PIR. In particular, the proposed SC-PIR schemes require the size of each file to be only $L = Nt{K-1}$ compared to the state-of-the-art $L = {N \choose t}tK$. Hence, we conclude that PIR may not meet coded caching when the size of $L$ is constrained.

Citations (8)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.