Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
140 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Adaptation in multivariate log-concave density estimation (1812.11634v2)

Published 30 Dec 2018 in math.ST and stat.TH

Abstract: We study the adaptation properties of the multivariate log-concave maximum likelihood estimator over three subclasses of log-concave densities. The first consists of densities with polyhedral support whose logarithms are piecewise affine. The complexity of such densities~$f$ can be measured in terms of the sum $\Gamma(f)$ of the numbers of facets of the subdomains in the polyhedral subdivision of the support induced by $f$. Given $n$ independent observations from a $d$-dimensional log-concave density with $d \in {2,3}$, we prove a sharp oracle inequality, which in particular implies that the Kullback--Leibler risk of the log-concave maximum likelihood estimator for such densities is bounded above by $\Gamma(f)/n$, up to a polylogarithmic factor. Thus, the rate can be essentially parametric, even in this multivariate setting. For the second type of adaptation, we consider densities that are bounded away from zero on a polytopal support; we show that up to polylogarithmic factors, the log-concave maximum likelihood estimator attains the rate $n{-4/7}$ when $d=3$, which is faster than the worst-case rate of $n{-1/2}$. Finally, our third type of subclass consists of densities whose contours are well-separated; these new classes are constructed to be affine invariant and turn out to contain a wide variety of densities, including those that satisfy H\"older regularity conditions. Here, we prove another sharp oracle inequality, which reveals in particular that the log-concave maximum likelihood estimator attains a risk bound of order $n{-\min\bigl(\frac{\beta+3}{\beta+7},\frac{4}{7}\bigr)}$ when $d=3$ over the class of $\beta$-H\"older log-concave densities with $\beta\in (1,3]$, again up to a polylogarithmic factor.

Citations (14)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.