Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Accuracy, Uncertainty, and Adaptability of Automatic Myocardial ASL Segmentation using Deep CNN (1812.03974v4)

Published 10 Dec 2018 in cs.CV

Abstract: PURPOSE: To apply deep CNN to the segmentation task in myocardial arterial spin labeled (ASL) perfusion imaging and to develop methods that measure uncertainty and that adapt the CNN model to a specific false positive vs. false negative tradeoff. METHODS: The Monte Carlo dropout (MCD) U-Net was trained on data from 22 subjects and tested on data from 6 heart transplant recipients. Manual segmentation and regional myocardial blood flow (MBF) were available for comparison. We consider two global uncertainty measures, named Dice Uncertainty and MCD Uncertainty, which were calculated with and without the use of manual segmentation, respectively. Tversky loss function with a hyperparameter $\beta$ was used to adapt the model to a specific false positive vs. false negative tradeoff. RESULTS: The MCD U-Net achieved Dice coefficient of mean(std) = 0.91(0.04) on the test set. MBF measured using automatic segmentations was highly correlated to that measured using the manual segmentation ($R2$ = 0.96). Dice Uncertainty and MCD Uncertainty were in good agreement ($R2$ = 0.64). As $\beta$ increased, the false positive rate systematically decreased and false negative rate systematically increased. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate the feasibility of deep CNN for automatic segmentation of myocardial ASL, with good accuracy. We also introduce two simple methods for assessing model uncertainty. Finally, we demonstrate the ability to adapt the CNN model to a specific false positive vs. false negative tradeoff. These findings are directly relevant to automatic segmentation in quantitative cardiac MRI and are broadly applicable to automatic segmentation problems in diagnostic imaging.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Hung P. Do (1 paper)
  2. Yi Guo (115 papers)
  3. Andrew J. Yoon (1 paper)
  4. Krishna S. Nayak (7 papers)
Citations (21)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.