Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
110 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Faster sublinear approximations of $k$-cliques for low arboricity graphs (1811.04425v1)

Published 11 Nov 2018 in cs.DS

Abstract: Given query access to an undirected graph $G$, we consider the problem of computing a $(1\pm\epsilon)$-approximation of the number of $k$-cliques in $G$. The standard query model for general graphs allows for degree queries, neighbor queries, and pair queries. Let $n$ be the number of vertices, $m$ be the number of edges, and $n_k$ be the number of $k$-cliques. Previous work by Eden, Ron and Seshadhri (STOC 2018) gives an $O*(\frac{n}{n{1/k}_k} + \frac{m{k/2}}{n_k})$-time algorithm for this problem (we use $O*(\cdot)$ to suppress $\poly(\log n, 1/\epsilon, kk)$ dependencies). Moreover, this bound is nearly optimal when the expression is sublinear in the size of the graph. Our motivation is to circumvent this lower bound, by parameterizing the complexity in terms of \emph{graph arboricity}. The arboricity of $G$ is a measure for the graph density "everywhere". We design an algorithm for the class of graphs with arboricity at most $\alpha$, whose running time is $O*(\min{\frac{n\alpha{k-1}}{n_k},\, \frac{n}{n_k{1/k}}+\frac{m \alpha{k-2}}{n_k} })$. We also prove a nearly matching lower bound. For all graphs, the arboricity is $O(\sqrt m)$, so this bound subsumes all previous results on sublinear clique approximation. As a special case of interest, consider minor-closed families of graphs, which have constant arboricity. Our result implies that for any minor-closed family of graphs, there is a $(1\pm\epsilon)$-approximation algorithm for $n_k$ that has running time $O*(\frac{n}{n_k})$. Such a bound was not known even for the special (classic) case of triangle counting in planar graphs.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Talya Eden (27 papers)
  2. Dana Ron (32 papers)
  3. C. Seshadhri (89 papers)
Citations (7)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.