Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
102 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

New bounds on the anti-Ramsey numbers of star graphs (1810.00624v2)

Published 1 Oct 2018 in cs.DM and math.CO

Abstract: The anti-Ramsey number $ar(G,H)$ with input graph $G$ and pattern graph $H$, is the maximum positive integer $k$ such that there exists an edge coloring of $G$ using $k$ colors, in which there are no rainbow subgraphs isomorphic to $H$ in $G$. ($H$ is rainbow if all its edges get distinct colors). The concept of anti-Ramsey number was introduced by Erd\"os, Simanovitz, and S\'os in 1973. Thereafter several researchers investigated this concept in the combinatorial setting. Recently, Feng et al. revisited the anti-Ramsey problem for the pattern graph $K_{1,t}$ (for $t \geq 3$) purely from an algorithmic point of view due to its applications in interference modeling of wireless networks. They posed it as an optimization problem, the maximum edge $q$-coloring problem. For a graph $G$ and an integer $q\geq 2$, an edge $q$-coloring of $G$ is an assignment of colors to edges of $G$, such that edges incident on a vertex span at most $q$ distinct colors. The maximum edge $q$-coloring problem seeks to maximize the number of colors in an edge $q$-coloring of the graph $G$. Note that the optimum value of the edge $q$-coloring problem of $G$ equals $ar(G,K_{1,q+1})$. In this paper, we study $ar(G,K_{1,t})$, the anti-Ramsey number of stars, for each fixed integer $t\geq 3$, both from combinatorial and algorithmic point of view. The first of our main results presents an upper bound for $ar(G,K_{1,q+1})$, in terms of number of vertices and the minimum degree of $G$. The second one improves this result for the case of triangle-free input graphs. For a positive integer $t$, let $H_t$ denote a subgraph of $G$ with maximum number of possible edges and maximum degree $t$. Our third main result presents an upper bound for $ar(G,K_{1,q+1})$ in terms of $|E(H_{q-1})|$. All our results have algorithmic consequences.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (6)
  1. L. Sunil Chandran (55 papers)
  2. Talha Hashim (1 paper)
  3. Dalu Jacob (9 papers)
  4. Rogers Mathew (40 papers)
  5. Deepak Rajendraprasad (37 papers)
  6. Nitin Singh (13 papers)
Citations (2)