Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A design-through-analysis approach using the Finite Cell Method (ECCOMAS Congress 2016) (1809.09942v1)

Published 26 Sep 2018 in cs.CE

Abstract: Modern 3D Computer-Aided-Design (CAD) systems use mainly two types of geometric models. Classically, objects are defined by a Boundary Representation (B-Rep), where only the objects' surfaces with their corresponding edges and nodes are stored. One disadvantage concerning a numerical simulation is that B-Rep models are not necessarily watertight. These 'dirty geometries' cause major difficulties in computational analysis because even basic geometric operations such as point-in-membership tests fail, not to mention meshing as required by classical boundary conforming finite element methods. Alternatively, objects may be represented by Constructive Solid Geometry (CSG), which is strongly related to Procedural Modeling (PM). In this context, the model is created using Boolean operations on primitives. The modeling process is then either stored as a sequence (PM), or as a construction tree (CSG). In contrast to B-Rep models, CSG models are intrinsically water-tight. To run a finite element simulation on a water-tight CSG model, two alternatives are possible: (i) it can either be converted to a B-Rep-model to obtain a finite element mesh or (ii) its implicit description can be used directly by applying an embedded domain approach, like the Finite Cell Method (FCM). In this contribution, we present a design-through analysis methodology using CSG and FCM. A crucial point in FCM is a fast and reliable point-in-membership test which can be directly derived from the CSG model. We present the outline of the modeling approach, the realization of the point-in-membership test as a sequence of CSG-operations, and discuss advantages and limitations on complex models of relevance in mechanical engineering.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Benjamin Wassermann (4 papers)
  2. Tino Bog (2 papers)
  3. Stefan Kollmannsberger (37 papers)
  4. Ernst Rank (33 papers)
Citations (5)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.