Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
110 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Structure-Preserving Transformation: Generating Diverse and Transferable Adversarial Examples (1809.02786v3)

Published 8 Sep 2018 in cs.LG, cs.AI, cs.CR, cs.CV, and stat.ML

Abstract: Adversarial examples are perturbed inputs designed to fool machine learning models. Most recent works on adversarial examples for image classification focus on directly modifying pixels with minor perturbations. A common requirement in all these works is that the malicious perturbations should be small enough (measured by an L_p norm for some p) so that they are imperceptible to humans. However, small perturbations can be unnecessarily restrictive and limit the diversity of adversarial examples generated. Further, an L_p norm based distance metric ignores important structure patterns hidden in images that are important to human perception. Consequently, even the minor perturbation introduced in recent works often makes the adversarial examples less natural to humans. More importantly, they often do not transfer well and are therefore less effective when attacking black-box models especially for those protected by a defense mechanism. In this paper, we propose a structure-preserving transformation (SPT) for generating natural and diverse adversarial examples with extremely high transferability. The key idea of our approach is to allow perceptible deviation in adversarial examples while keeping structure patterns that are central to a human classifier. Empirical results on the MNIST and the fashion-MNIST datasets show that adversarial examples generated by our approach can easily bypass strong adversarial training. Further, they transfer well to other target models with no loss or little loss of successful attack rate.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Dan Peng (12 papers)
  2. Zizhan Zheng (33 papers)
  3. Xiaofeng Zhang (63 papers)
Citations (5)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.