Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
156 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Subspace-Invariant AC$^0$ Formulas (1806.04831v4)

Published 13 Jun 2018 in cs.LO and cs.CC

Abstract: We consider the action of a linear subspace $U$ of ${0,1}n$ on the set of AC$0$ formulas with inputs labeled by literals in the set ${X_1,\overline X_1,\dots,X_n,\overline X_n}$, where an element $u \in U$ acts on formulas by transposing the $i$th pair of literals for all $i \in [n]$ such that $u_i=1$. A formula is {\em $U$-invariant} if it is fixed by this action. For example, there is a well-known recursive construction of depth $d+1$ formulas of size $O(n{\cdot}2{dn{1/d}})$ computing the $n$-variable PARITY function; these formulas are easily seen to be $P$-invariant where $P$ is the subspace of even-weight elements of ${0,1}n$. In this paper we establish a nearly matching $2{d(n{1/d}-1)}$ lower bound on the $P$-invariant depth $d+1$ formula size of PARITY. Quantitatively this improves the best known $\Omega(2{\frac{1}{84}d(n{1/d}-1)})$ lower bound for {\em unrestricted} depth $d+1$ formulas, while avoiding the use of the switching lemma. More generally, for any linear subspaces $U \subset V$, we show that if a Boolean function is $U$-invariant and non-constant over $V$, then its $U$-invariant depth $d+1$ formula size is at least $2{d(m{1/d}-1)}$ where $m$ is the minimum Hamming weight of a vector in $U\bot \setminus V\bot$.

Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.