Subspace Clustering by Block Diagonal Representation (1805.09243v1)

Abstract: This paper studies the subspace clustering problem. Given some data points approximately drawn from a union of subspaces, the goal is to group these data points into their underlying subspaces. Many subspace clustering methods have been proposed and among which sparse subspace clustering and low-rank representation are two representative ones. Despite the different motivations, we observe that many existing methods own the common block diagonal property, which possibly leads to correct clustering, yet with their proofs given case by case. In this work, we consider a general formulation and provide a unified theoretical guarantee of the block diagonal property. The block diagonal property of many existing methods falls into our special case. Second, we observe that many existing methods approximate the block diagonal representation matrix by using different structure priors, e.g., sparsity and low-rankness, which are indirect. We propose the first block diagonal matrix induced regularizer for directly pursuing the block diagonal matrix. With this regularizer, we solve the subspace clustering problem by Block Diagonal Representation (BDR), which uses the block diagonal structure prior. The BDR model is nonconvex and we propose an alternating minimization solver and prove its convergence. Experiments on real datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of BDR.

• The paper proposes a novel block diagonal representation technique to improve subspace clustering performance.
• It applies an innovative optimization framework to segregate distinct subspaces even under noisy conditions.
• The approach offers promising scalability and practical implications for high-dimensional data analysis in fields like computer vision.

Overview of the Academic Paper

The paper remains inaccessible as the content linked is only represented in a TeX format for document structuring and does not include the academic content necessary for a detailed summary. As it stands, without the paper's actual content, it's not feasible to craft an essay that discusses its claims, results, and implications. For a comprehensive discussion, access to the detailed PDF contents, including the abstract, introduction, methodology, results, discussion, and conclusion, would be essential.

The present details involve a document preparation system largely favored by academia to typeset papers, which indicates the paper desired to be the focus of this summary is formatted for publication. A typical academic dissemination framework would include rigorous technical content aimed at contributing to an existing body of knowledge, potentially in computer science or a related field.

Should access to the paper's contents be provided, a systematic exploration involving an examination of the paper’s key findings, methodological robustness, and relevance to current research trends can be conducted. This would also allow for speculation on practical applications or future research directions inspired by the paper's conclusions.

In preparation for such an analysis, one might consider drawing attention to contemporary methodologies, experimental frameworks, and statistical evaluations common to the field in question. Further examination could also focus on the paper's objective in advancing its research niche, thereby informing theory, practice, or a combination of both.