Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
133 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Homogenization for non-local elliptic operators in both perforated and non-perforated domains (1805.06264v1)

Published 16 May 2018 in math.AP

Abstract: In this paper, we focus on the homogenization process of the non-local elliptic boundary value problem $$\mathcal{L}\varepsilons u\varepsilon =(-\nabla\cdot (A_\varepsilon(x)\nabla)){s}u_\varepsilon=f \mbox{ in } \mathcal O, $$ with $0<s\<1$, considering non-homogeneous Dirichlet type condition outside of the bounded domain $\mathcal O\subseteq \mathbb{R}^n$. We find the homogenized problem by using the $H$-convergence method, as $\varepsilon\to 0$, under standard uniform ellipticity, boundedness and symmetry assumptions on coefficients $A_\varepsilon(x)$, with the homogenized coefficients as the standard $H$-limit (cf. \cite{MT1}) of the sequence $\{A_\varepsilon\}_{\varepsilon\>0}$. We also prove that the commonly referred to as \textit{the strange term} in the literature (see \cite[Chapter 4]{MT}) does not appear in the homogenized problem associated with the fractional Laplace operator $(-\Delta)s$ in a perforated domain. Both of these results have been obtained in the class of general microstructures. Consequently, we could certify that the homogenization process, as $\varepsilon\to 0$, is stable under $s\to 1{-}$ in the non-perforated domains, but not necessarily in the case of perforated domains.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.