Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

PANDA: Facilitating Usable AI Development (1804.09997v1)

Published 26 Apr 2018 in cs.AI and cs.DB

Abstract: Recent advances in AI and machine learning have created a general perception that AI could be used to solve complex problems, and in some situations over-hyped as a tool that can be so easily used. Unfortunately, the barrier to realization of mass adoption of AI on various business domains is too high because most domain experts have no background in AI. Developing AI applications involves multiple phases, namely data preparation, application modeling, and product deployment. The effort of AI research has been spent mostly on new AI models (in the model training stage) to improve the performance of benchmark tasks such as image recognition. Many other factors such as usability, efficiency and security of AI have not been well addressed, and therefore form a barrier to democratizing AI. Further, for many real world applications such as healthcare and autonomous driving, learning via huge amounts of possibility exploration is not feasible since humans are involved. In many complex applications such as healthcare, subject matter experts (e.g. Clinicians) are the ones who appreciate the importance of features that affect health, and their knowledge together with existing knowledge bases are critical to the end results. In this paper, we take a new perspective on developing AI solutions, and present a solution for making AI usable. We hope that this resolution will enable all subject matter experts (eg. Clinicians) to exploit AI like data scientists.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (10)
  1. Jinyang Gao (35 papers)
  2. Wei Wang (1793 papers)
  3. Meihui Zhang (36 papers)
  4. Gang Chen (592 papers)
  5. H. V. Jagadish (41 papers)
  6. Guoliang Li (125 papers)
  7. Teck Khim Ng (9 papers)
  8. Beng Chin Ooi (79 papers)
  9. Sheng Wang (239 papers)
  10. Jingren Zhou (198 papers)
Citations (4)