Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
102 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

To Find Where You Talk: Temporal Sentence Localization in Video with Attention Based Location Regression (1804.07014v4)

Published 19 Apr 2018 in cs.CV

Abstract: Given an untrimmed video and a sentence description, temporal sentence localization aims to automatically determine the start and end points of the described sentence within the video. The problem is challenging as it needs the understanding of both video and sentence. Existing research predominantly employs a costly "scan and localize" framework, neglecting the global video context and the specific details within sentences which play as critical issues for this problem. In this paper, we propose a novel Attention Based Location Regression (ABLR) approach to solve the temporal sentence localization from a global perspective. Specifically, to preserve the context information, ABLR first encodes both video and sentence via Bidirectional LSTM networks. Then, a multi-modal co-attention mechanism is introduced to generate not only video attention which reflects the global video structure, but also sentence attention which highlights the crucial details for temporal localization. Finally, a novel attention based location regression network is designed to predict the temporal coordinates of sentence query from the previous attention. ABLR is jointly trained in an end-to-end manner. Comprehensive experiments on ActivityNet Captions and TACoS datasets demonstrate both the effectiveness and the efficiency of the proposed ABLR approach.

Temporal Sentence Localization in Video: An Insightful Overview of the Attention Based Location Regression Approach

The remarkable expansion of video content on the internet, usually accompanied by textual descriptions such as captions, titles, and comments, has generated substantial interest in understanding and associating specific video segments with informative textual data. This paper by Yuan, Mei, and Zhu addresses the nascent challenge of temporal sentence localization within videos, focusing on automatically identifying the start and end times for a given sentence within an untrimmed video. This task is critical for enhancing video-text understanding applications, and yet it presents significant challenges including maintaining intrinsic temporal structures, fully leveraging sentence semantics, and ensuring computational efficiency for long videos.

Methodological Approach: Attention Based Location Regression (ABLR)

The authors propose the Attention Based Location Regression (ABLR) model to solve the temporal sentence localization problem. This model is unique in its end-to-end architecture, circumventing the conventional "scan and localize" strategy that is often burdened by computational inefficiencies and limited by local perspectives. ABLR is designed to capture both the global temporal structure of videos and the nuanced details within sentence descriptions. The method relies on three pivotal components:

  1. Contextual Feature Encoding: ABLR utilizes Bi-directional LSTM networks to encode both video and text inputs. This ensures that each unit of video or text is enriched with contextual information, crucial for maintaining the global video sequence coherence essential for accurate temporal localization.
  2. Multi-Modal Co-Attention Mechanism: This innovation allows for the dynamic interaction between video and text, generating attentions that reflect the global temporal structure of video content while highlighting critical sentence details that serve as guideposts for temporal prediction.
  3. Attention Based Coordinates Prediction: Unlike methods necessitating post-processing for boundary refinement, ABLR employs a regression network that directly predicts temporal coordinates from the attention outputs. This integration enhances both efficiency and localization accuracy.

Experimental Results and Insights

ABLR's performance was benchmarked on the ActivityNet Captions and TACoS datasets, showing significant improvements over existing models in both localization effectiveness and computational efficiency. Notably, on the ActivityNet Captions dataset, ABLR demonstrated a substantial increase in mean IoU scores compared to methods such as MCN, CTRL, and ACRN, confirming its superior accuracy. The method's efficacy is attributed to its ability to preserve video context and leverage sentence details through the co-attention mechanism, effectively overcoming the limitations of previous architectures that relied on local matching strategies.

Implications and Future Directions

The significant findings associated with ABLR provide vital implications for video-text understanding technologies, expanding the capabilities to more efficiently and accurately parse and analyze video content in various real-world applications such as automated editing, video summarization, and retrieval systems. The practical benefits underscore the importance of preserving global temporal structures and leveraging nuanced sentence semantics for improving temporal localization models.

The research suggests promising directions for future explorations, including advances in multi-sentence localization within videos and expanding the model's capabilities to incorporate both spatial and temporal dimensions. As AI continues to evolve, these refinements could further bridge the gap between video content and meaningful textual descriptions, enhancing the interpretability and utility of video datasets.

In conclusion, the ABLR model presents a robust solution to temporal sentence localization in video, combining computational efficiency with localization accuracy. This research significantly contributes to the growing field of video-text understanding, offering a pathway to more cogent and contextually aware media processing tools.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Yitian Yuan (16 papers)
  2. Tao Mei (209 papers)
  3. Wenwu Zhu (104 papers)
Citations (315)