Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
139 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Monte Carlo Top Quark Mass Calibration (1803.02321v1)

Published 6 Mar 2018 in hep-ph

Abstract: The most precise top quark mass measurements use kinematic reconstruction methods, determining the top mass parameter of a Monte Carlo event generator, $m_t{\rm MC}$. Due to the complicated interplay of hadronization and parton shower dynamics in Monte Carlo event generators relevant for kinematic reconstruction, relating $m_t{\rm MC}$ to field theory masses is a non-trivial task. In this talk we report on a calibration procedure to determine this relation using hadron level QCD predictions for 2-Jettiness in $e+e-$ annihilation, an observable which has kinematic top mass sensitivity and a close relation to the invariant mass of the particles coming from the top decay. The theoretical ingredients of the QCD prediction are reviewed. Fitting $e+e-$ 2-Jettiness calculations at NLL/NNLL order to PYTHIA 8.205, we find that $m_t{\rm MC}$ agrees with the MSR mass $m_{t,1\,{\rm GeV}}{\rm MSR}$ within uncertainties. At NNLL we find $m_t{\rm MC} = m_{t,1\,{\rm GeV}}{\rm MSR} + (0.18 \pm 0.22)\,{\rm GeV}$. $m_t{\rm MC}$ can differ from the pole mass $m_t{\rm pole}$ by up to $600\,{\rm MeV}$, and using the pole mass generally leads to larger uncertainties. At NNLL we find $m_t{\rm MC} = m_t{\rm pole} + (0.57 \pm 0.28)\,{\rm GeV}$ as the fit result. In contrast, converting $m_{t,1\,{\rm GeV}}{\rm MSR}$ obtained at NNLL to the pole mass gives a result for $m_t{\rm pole}$ that is substantially larger and incompatible with the fit result. We also explain some theoretical aspects relevant for employing the C-parameter as an alternative calibration observable.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.