Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
110 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A Tutorial on Modeling and Analysis of Dynamic Social Networks. Part II (1801.06719v2)

Published 20 Jan 2018 in cs.SI, cs.SY, math.OC, nlin.AO, and physics.soc-ph

Abstract: Recent years have witnessed a significant trend towards filling the gap between Social Network Analysis (SNA) and control theory. This trend was enabled by the introduction of new mathematical models describing dynamics of social groups, the development of algorithms and software for data analysis and the tremendous progress in understanding complex networks and multi-agent systems (MAS) dynamics. The aim of this tutorial is to highlight a novel chapter of control theory, dealing with dynamic models of social networks and processes over them, to the attention of the broad research community. In its first part [1], we have considered the most classical models of social dynamics, which have anticipated and to a great extent inspired the recent extensive studies on MAS and complex networks. This paper is the second part of the tutorial, and it is focused on more recent models of social processes that have been developed concurrently with MAS theory. Future perspectives of control in social and techno-social systems are also discussed.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (2)
  1. Anton Proskurnikov (9 papers)
  2. Roberto Tempo (25 papers)
Citations (196)

Summary

A Comprehensive Analysis of Dynamic Social Networks: Part II

The paper "A Tutorial on Modeling and Analysis of Dynamic Social Networks. Part II" by Proskurnikov and Tempo explores the intersection of Social Network Analysis (SNA) and control theory, further building on its predecessor which covered classical models of social dynamics. This sequel focuses on contemporary models emerging alongside Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) theory, aiming to elucidate recent advancements and methodologies to a scholarly audience.

In its introduction, the paper underscores a burgeoning trend in bridging the disciplines of SNA and control theory. This confluence is propelled by the advent of sophisticated mathematical models that characterize the dynamic interactions within social groups, paired with the evolution of algorithms and analytical tools that facilitate comprehensive data analysis.

Key Contributions

This second tutorial instaLLMent is characterized by several central contributions:

  1. Contemporary Social Process Models: The paper introduces models that explicate the dynamics and evolution of social opinions across networks, acknowledging their development in parallel with MAS theory. These models are pivotal for understanding how opinions form, propagate, and potentially reach consensus within social groups.
  2. Advanced Methodological Techniques: The authors address the advancements in mathematical and computational techniques that allow for a deeper exploration of MAS dynamics within complex social networks. This includes distributed algorithms that are integral to processing vast datasets typical of SNA.
  3. Negative Interaction Analysis: A novel field explored in this paper is the incorporation of negative interactions within social networks. The authors highlight the importance of understanding contentious interactions and their impact on opinion dynamics, a topic of increasing relevance given the contentious nature of many societal discourses.
  4. Future Control Perspectives: The paper speculates on prospective developments in control theory as applied to social and techno-social systems. Such insights are crucial for forecasting future trajectories in both theoretical advancements and practical applications of MAS.

Implications

The work carried out in this paper holds substantial implications for both theory and practice. Theoretically, it expands the landscape of control theory by integrating insights from social sciences, thus fostering a multidisciplinary approach to network analysis. Practically, these models and methodologies can be instrumental in designing algorithms for real-world applications such as social media analysis, collaborative technology platforms, and automated decision-making systems.

Furthermore, by bringing negative interactions into the purview of network dynamics, the paper lays the groundwork for more resilient social systems that can withstand disruptions caused by negative influences. This has implications for developing socio-technical systems that remain robust in face of adversarial actions or misinformation.

Future Horizons

Looking forward, this area of research will likely emphasize the development of more efficient distributed algorithms capable of handling the ever-increasing complexity and size of social networks. Additionally, the integration of heterogeneous data sources, such as combining textual, visual, and behavioral data, may offer richer insights into social dynamics.

For scholars in the domain of control theory and social network analysis, this paper serves as a critical resource that not only reflects on the current state of research but also poses thought-provoking questions about the future of dynamic network modeling. As networks continue to evolve, embracing complexity and a multidisciplinary approach will be key to unlocking new potentials within this field.