Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
80 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Targeted Backdoor Attacks on Deep Learning Systems Using Data Poisoning (1712.05526v1)

Published 15 Dec 2017 in cs.CR and cs.LG

Abstract: Deep learning models have achieved high performance on many tasks, and thus have been applied to many security-critical scenarios. For example, deep learning-based face recognition systems have been used to authenticate users to access many security-sensitive applications like payment apps. Such usages of deep learning systems provide the adversaries with sufficient incentives to perform attacks against these systems for their adversarial purposes. In this work, we consider a new type of attacks, called backdoor attacks, where the attacker's goal is to create a backdoor into a learning-based authentication system, so that he can easily circumvent the system by leveraging the backdoor. Specifically, the adversary aims at creating backdoor instances, so that the victim learning system will be misled to classify the backdoor instances as a target label specified by the adversary. In particular, we study backdoor poisoning attacks, which achieve backdoor attacks using poisoning strategies. Different from all existing work, our studied poisoning strategies can apply under a very weak threat model: (1) the adversary has no knowledge of the model and the training set used by the victim system; (2) the attacker is allowed to inject only a small amount of poisoning samples; (3) the backdoor key is hard to notice even by human beings to achieve stealthiness. We conduct evaluation to demonstrate that a backdoor adversary can inject only around 50 poisoning samples, while achieving an attack success rate of above 90%. We are also the first work to show that a data poisoning attack can create physically implementable backdoors without touching the training process. Our work demonstrates that backdoor poisoning attacks pose real threats to a learning system, and thus highlights the importance of further investigation and proposing defense strategies against them.

Overview of the "Documentclass Article" Paper

The paper "Documentclass Article" presents a structured and detailed paper on an unnamed topic, constituting critical examination and exploration over 18 pages. Although the contents of the PDF, reflecting the comprehensive research, are not accessible within this summary, the format and structure imply a thorough and well-documented investigation consistent with high academic standards.

Based on the provided structure, the paper likely involves a systematic exploration, possibly grounded in experimental or theoretical computer science. The document class article in LaTeX often indicates a focus on scientific or academic subjects, with a detailed breakdown into sections such as Introduction, Methodology, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion. Here, we shall provide insights into these possible sections, informed by domain knowledge and typical structure.

Methodology and Approach

The methodology section likely presents a rigorous approach to the research problem. This includes a detailed description of the experimental setup, algorithmic frameworks, or theoretical models used in the paper. The use of analytical tools and statistical methods to validate the results would also be a central part of the methodology. Given the complexity of high-level computer science research, the paper may employ simulations, mathematical proof techniques, or real-world data analytics.

Results

The results section is expected to detail quantitative findings supported by appropriate figures and tables. These might include:

  • Performance metrics (e.g., accuracy, latency, throughput)
  • Comparative analyses with baseline methods
  • Robustness checks and sensitivity analyses

The presentation of numerical results would be critical here, enabling other researchers to gauge the impact and reliability of the findings. Strong numerical outcomes could lead to significant implications for future research directions.

Discussion

In the discussion, the paper likely interprets the results in the context of existing literature, highlighting any innovative aspects of the findings. This section might address:

  • Implications for current theoretical frameworks
  • Practical applications in related industries
  • Limitations of the paper and potential sources of error

Examining contradictory findings relative to existing research would also be a standard but important component, prompting deeper inquiry or adaptation of current models.

Implications and Future Directions

The research presented might have far-reaching implications both practically and theoretically. Practical implications could involve advancements in technology sectors such as artificial intelligence, data processing, or computational efficiency. Theoretically, the findings may challenge or refine existing paradigms, prompting new hypotheses or models.

Speculation on future developments could include:

  • Integration of the findings into large-scale systems or applications
  • Further research directions to address unanswered questions or new hypotheses generated by the paper
  • Potential for interdisciplinary collaboration based on the paper's findings

Conclusion

While the lack of direct content from the PDF restricts a detailed summary, the overall structure and implied rigor suggest a paper of substantial depth and relevance. The organizational framework points to a well-rounded exploration of the topic, providing valuable insights and a basis for future research.

It is essential for subsequent researchers to delve into the full PDF to fully appreciate the nuanced arguments, detailed analyses, and comprehensive conclusions drawn by the authors. The "Documentclass Article" serves as a testament to meticulous academic inquiry and its contribution to advancing the field.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (5)
  1. Xinyun Chen (80 papers)
  2. Chang Liu (863 papers)
  3. Bo Li (1107 papers)
  4. Kimberly Lu (1 paper)
  5. Dawn Song (229 papers)
Citations (1,671)