Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
102 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

No Need for a Lexicon? Evaluating the Value of the Pronunciation Lexica in End-to-End Models (1712.01864v1)

Published 5 Dec 2017 in cs.CL, cs.SD, eess.AS, and stat.ML

Abstract: For decades, context-dependent phonemes have been the dominant sub-word unit for conventional acoustic modeling systems. This status quo has begun to be challenged recently by end-to-end models which seek to combine acoustic, pronunciation, and LLM components into a single neural network. Such systems, which typically predict graphemes or words, simplify the recognition process since they remove the need for a separate expert-curated pronunciation lexicon to map from phoneme-based units to words. However, there has been little previous work comparing phoneme-based versus grapheme-based sub-word units in the end-to-end modeling framework, to determine whether the gains from such approaches are primarily due to the new probabilistic model, or from the joint learning of the various components with grapheme-based units. In this work, we conduct detailed experiments which are aimed at quantifying the value of phoneme-based pronunciation lexica in the context of end-to-end models. We examine phoneme-based end-to-end models, which are contrasted against grapheme-based ones on a large vocabulary English Voice-search task, where we find that graphemes do indeed outperform phonemes. We also compare grapheme and phoneme-based approaches on a multi-dialect English task, which once again confirm the superiority of graphemes, greatly simplifying the system for recognizing multiple dialects.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (12)
  1. Tara N. Sainath (79 papers)
  2. Rohit Prabhavalkar (59 papers)
  3. Shankar Kumar (34 papers)
  4. Seungji Lee (2 papers)
  5. Anjuli Kannan (19 papers)
  6. David Rybach (19 papers)
  7. Vlad Schogol (2 papers)
  8. Patrick Nguyen (15 papers)
  9. Bo Li (1107 papers)
  10. Yonghui Wu (115 papers)
  11. Zhifeng Chen (65 papers)
  12. Chung-Cheng Chiu (48 papers)
Citations (53)