Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
173 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Is the non-isothermal double $β$-model incompatible with no time evolution of galaxy cluster gas mass fraction ? (1711.05173v2)

Published 14 Nov 2017 in astro-ph.CO

Abstract: In this paper, we propose a new method to obtain the depletion factor $\gamma(z)$, the ratio by which the measured baryon fraction in galaxy clusters is depleted with respect to the universal mean. We use exclusively galaxy cluster data, namely, X-ray gas mass fraction ($f_{gas}$) and angular diameter distance measurements from Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect plus X-ray observations. The galaxy clusters are the same in both data set and the non-isothermal spherical double $\beta$-model was used to describe their electron density and temperature profiles. In order to compare our results with those from recent cosmological hydrodynamical simulations, we suppose a possible time evolution for $\gamma(z)$, such as, $\gamma(z) = \gamma_0(1 + \gamma_1z)$. As main conclusions we found that: the $\gamma_0$ value is in full agreement with the simulations. { On the other hand, although the $\gamma_1$ value found in our analysis is compatible with $\gamma_1=0$ within 2$\sigma$ c.l., our results show a non-negligible time evolution for the depletion factor, unlike the results of the simulations. However, we also put constraints on $\gamma (z)$ by using the $f_{gas}$ measurements and angular diameter distances obtained from the flat $\Lambda$CDM model (Planck results) and from a sample of galaxy clusters described by a elliptical profile. For these cases no significant time evolution for $\gamma(z)$ was found. Then, if a constant depletion factor is an inherent characteristic of these structures, our results show that the spherical double $\beta$-model used to describe the galaxy clusters considered does not affect the quality of their $f_{gas}$ measurements.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.