Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
125 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A Web of Hate: Tackling Hateful Speech in Online Social Spaces (1709.10159v1)

Published 28 Sep 2017 in cs.CL

Abstract: Online social platforms are beset with hateful speech - content that expresses hatred for a person or group of people. Such content can frighten, intimidate, or silence platform users, and some of it can inspire other users to commit violence. Despite widespread recognition of the problems posed by such content, reliable solutions even for detecting hateful speech are lacking. In the present work, we establish why keyword-based methods are insufficient for detection. We then propose an approach to detecting hateful speech that uses content produced by self-identifying hateful communities as training data. Our approach bypasses the expensive annotation process often required to train keyword systems and performs well across several established platforms, making substantial improvements over current state-of-the-art approaches.

Citations (172)

Summary

  • The paper identifies significant limitations in keyword-based methods for detecting online hate speech, highlighting shared vocabulary issues and the omission of nuanced language.
  • A novel community-based training approach is proposed and shown to improve classifier accuracy across platforms like Reddit and Voat, enabling better distinction between hateful and non-hateful content.
  • The findings have practical implications for online platforms by providing a more effective method for identifying and managing hateful content, though adaptation for short-text platforms is needed.

Tackling Hateful Speech in Online Social Spaces

The paper entitled "A Web of Hate: Tackling Hateful Speech in Online Social Spaces" explores the challenges of identifying and mitigating hateful speech on online platforms. Authored by researchers from McGill University, The Ohio State University, and Harvard University, this work explores the fundamental limits of current detection methods, which rely heavily on keyword-based algorithms and manual annotation. The core premise is that these existing approaches fail to adequately capture the nuanced and evolving nature of hateful speech.

Key Contributions

The authors present three primary contributions:

  1. Analysis of Keywords-Based Methods: The research identifies substantial limitations in keyword-based approaches for detecting hateful speech. They highlight two primary issues: shared vocabulary with non-hateful content, specifically support communities for targeted groups, and the omission of nuanced language that may not include overtly offensive terms but is nonetheless degrading.
  2. Community-Based Training Approach: The paper proposes using self-identified hateful communities to construct LLMs representative of hateful speech. This community-driven method generates substantial, high-quality datasets without reliance on manual annotation, significantly improving the classifier's accuracy on various platforms such as Reddit, Voat, and standalone web forums.
  3. Cross-Platform Application: The paper demonstrates that classifiers trained on community-defined datasets from Reddit can perform effectively on other platforms, suggesting a generalized applicability of their approach across different social spaces.

Methodology and Results

Utilizing machine learning techniques such as Naive Bayes, Support Vector Machines, and Logistic Regression, the authors assess the classifier's performance on both inter-community and cross-platform levels. The results consistently show improvement over traditional keyword-based methods, with notable increases in precision, recall, and F1 scores. Importantly, the research indicates that a community-based approach can distinguish hateful speech from non-hateful support community content, despite the shared vocabulary between them.

Implications and Future Research

The implications of this work are dual-faceted, affecting both practical and theoretical domains. Practically, the proposed method enables online platform operators to more effectively identify and manage hateful content, reducing the need for user-reported identification and manual review processes. Theoretically, this research contributes to a deeper understanding of community-driven linguistic patterns and the nature of online hate speech.

However, the paper acknowledges the heterogeneous nature of online platforms and the necessity for further research into adapting these methods for short-text and less structured environments such as Twitter and Facebook. Additionally, expanding feature sets in the classifiers to include syntactic, semantic, and sentiment analysis presents a promising avenue for future exploration.

In conclusion, while the community-based approach to detect hateful speech online has demonstrated significant advantages over keyword-based systems, the dynamic nature of language necessitates ongoing refinement of these methods to keep pace with evolving communication practices within online communities.