Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Neural Networks for Text Correction and Completion in Keyboard Decoding (1709.06429v1)

Published 19 Sep 2017 in cs.CL and cs.LG

Abstract: Despite the ubiquity of mobile and wearable text messaging applications, the problem of keyboard text decoding is not tackled sufficiently in the light of the enormous success of the deep learning Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) for natural language understanding. In particular, considering that the keyboard decoders should operate on devices with memory and processor resource constraints, makes it challenging to deploy industrial scale deep neural network (DNN) models. This paper proposes a sequence-to-sequence neural attention network system for automatic text correction and completion. Given an erroneous sequence, our model encodes character level hidden representations and then decodes the revised sequence thus enabling auto-correction and completion. We achieve this by a combination of character level CNN and gated recurrent unit (GRU) encoder along with and a word level gated recurrent unit (GRU) attention decoder. Unlike traditional LLMs that learn from billions of words, our corpus size is only 12 million words; an order of magnitude smaller. The memory footprint of our learnt model for inference and prediction is also an order of magnitude smaller than the conventional LLM based text decoders. We report baseline performance for neural keyboard decoders in such limited domain. Our models achieve a word level accuracy of $90\%$ and a character error rate CER of $2.4\%$ over the Twitter typo dataset. We present a novel dataset of noisy to corrected mappings by inducing the noise distribution from the Twitter data over the OpenSubtitles 2009 dataset; on which our model predicts with a word level accuracy of $98\%$ and sequence accuracy of $68.9\%$. In our user study, our model achieved an average CER of $2.6\%$ with the state-of-the-art non-neural touch-screen keyboard decoder at CER of $1.6\%$.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (2)
  1. Shaona Ghosh (15 papers)
  2. Per Ola Kristensson (45 papers)
Citations (67)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.