Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
102 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

End-to-End Neural Ad-hoc Ranking with Kernel Pooling (1706.06613v1)

Published 20 Jun 2017 in cs.IR and cs.CL

Abstract: This paper proposes K-NRM, a kernel based neural model for document ranking. Given a query and a set of documents, K-NRM uses a translation matrix that models word-level similarities via word embeddings, a new kernel-pooling technique that uses kernels to extract multi-level soft match features, and a learning-to-rank layer that combines those features into the final ranking score. The whole model is trained end-to-end. The ranking layer learns desired feature patterns from the pairwise ranking loss. The kernels transfer the feature patterns into soft-match targets at each similarity level and enforce them on the translation matrix. The word embeddings are tuned accordingly so that they can produce the desired soft matches. Experiments on a commercial search engine's query log demonstrate the improvements of K-NRM over prior feature-based and neural-based states-of-the-art, and explain the source of K-NRM's advantage: Its kernel-guided embedding encodes a similarity metric tailored for matching query words to document words, and provides effective multi-level soft matches.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (5)
  1. Chenyan Xiong (95 papers)
  2. Zhuyun Dai (26 papers)
  3. Jamie Callan (43 papers)
  4. Zhiyuan Liu (433 papers)
  5. Russell Power (7 papers)
Citations (551)

Summary

Overview of K-NRM: End-to-End Neural Ad-hoc Ranking with Kernel Pooling

The paper introduces K-NRM, a sophisticated kernel-based neural model devised to enhance document ranking efficiency in ad-hoc search scenarios. This model innovatively integrates kernel pooling into the architecture, leveraging it to extract multi-level soft-match features from word embeddings and incorporating these features into a learning-to-rank framework. The entire model operates end-to-end, aiming to bridge the gap between discrete traditional models and newer, more fluid embeddings-based methods.

Key Components and Methodology

K-NRM employs several crucial components:

  1. Translation Matrix: Utilizing word embeddings, K-NRM constructs a translation matrix to ascertain word-level similarities between query and document pairs. These similarities form the foundational interaction signals for relevance estimation.
  2. Kernel-Pooling: The core advancement in K-NRM is the kernel-pooling layer. It employs radial basis function (RBF) kernels to create a soft term frequency (soft-TF) by measuring the distribution of word pair similarities across various similarity levels. This approach generalizes beyond exact or simple mean pooling, providing nuanced soft-matching capabilities.
  3. Learning-to-Rank Layer: K-NRM's differentiable ranking layer synthesizes soft-TF features to derive a final ranking score. This layer, combined with end-to-end training, ensures the model effectively learns relevance patterns directly from ranking data.

Experimental Performance and Insights

Empirical evaluations on a major commercial search engine's query logs demonstrate K-NRM's superior performance over prior feature-based and neural models, especially in terms of precision at top-ranking positions. The experiments reveal:

  • Robust improvements across in-domain, cross-domain, and raw user click scenarios, with enhancements reaching up to 65% in some cases.
  • K-NRM's strength derives from its ability to execute layered soft matches, distinguishing it from simpler uni-level or exact-matching methods.

Further analysis shows that the kernel-guided learning approach ensures word embeddings are finely tuned to the retrieval task, optimizing them to differentiate between relevance levels effectively.

Theoretical and Practical Implications

Theoretically, K-NRM advances the discourse on embedding integration within IR systems, showcasing how kernels can effectively mediate between rigid token matches and voluminous, data-driven embeddings. Practically, it offers a viable approach for enhancing search engine performance, particularly in the field of precise, high-stakes queries typical of commercial environments.

Future Directions

Potential future developments could involve exploring alternative kernel functions or analyzing the model's effectiveness in distinct domains beyond web search. Additionally, integrating external knowledge sources or contextual information could further enhance embedding learning, improving robustness and adaptability.

This paper position K-NRM as a compelling extension to the repertoire of neural ranking models, bridging critical gaps between traditional IR frameworks and advanced neural methodologies.