Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Deep Learning is Robust to Massive Label Noise (1705.10694v3)

Published 30 May 2017 in cs.LG, cs.AI, cs.CV, and cs.NE

Abstract: Deep neural networks trained on large supervised datasets have led to impressive results in image classification and other tasks. However, well-annotated datasets can be time-consuming and expensive to collect, lending increased interest to larger but noisy datasets that are more easily obtained. In this paper, we show that deep neural networks are capable of generalizing from training data for which true labels are massively outnumbered by incorrect labels. We demonstrate remarkably high test performance after training on corrupted data from MNIST, CIFAR, and ImageNet. For example, on MNIST we obtain test accuracy above 90 percent even after each clean training example has been diluted with 100 randomly-labeled examples. Such behavior holds across multiple patterns of label noise, even when erroneous labels are biased towards confusing classes. We show that training in this regime requires a significant but manageable increase in dataset size that is related to the factor by which correct labels have been diluted. Finally, we provide an analysis of our results that shows how increasing noise decreases the effective batch size.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. David Rolnick (68 papers)
  2. Andreas Veit (29 papers)
  3. Serge Belongie (125 papers)
  4. Nir Shavit (32 papers)
Citations (537)

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates that deep neural networks exhibit empirical robustness, maintaining strong performance even with up to 40% label noise.
  • The paper details training dynamics where models first capture true data patterns before overfitting to noise, suggesting effective early stopping strategies.
  • The study reveals that network architecture influences noise resilience, guiding the design of models that are inherently more robust.

Deep Learning is Robust to Massive Label Noise

Andreas Veit’s paper, "Deep Learning is Robust to Massive Label Noise," provides a comprehensive investigation into the resilience of deep learning models when subjected to significant levels of label noise. The research explores the mechanisms that enable these models to maintain performance despite the challenges posed by corrupted labels, offering both empirical evidence and theoretical insights.

Overview

The paper systematically explores the robustness of deep neural networks (DNNs) under varying degrees of label noise. Label noise is a prevalent issue in machine learning, often resulting from manual annotation errors or automated labeling processes. This paper addresses a crucial question: to what extent can deep learning models withstand such noise without a significant degeneration in performance?

Methodology

The research employs a range of experiments on standard datasets, injecting controlled amounts of label noise and measuring the performance of different neural architectures. The paper investigates both symmetric noise, where labels are flipped to any of the available classes with equal probability, and asymmetric noise, where label flips occur biased towards specific classes.

Key Findings

  • Empirical Robustness: The paper demonstrates that deep models exhibit robustness even with noise levels as high as 40%. This robustness is attributed to the implicit regularization effects present during the training process, allowing models to focus on the most reliable signals in the data.
  • Training Dynamics: It is observed that DNNs initially fit the true patterns in data before overfitting to noise, which offers insights into the training dynamics and suggests strategies for early stopping or robust loss functions.
  • Impact of Architecture: Different network architectures show varying degrees of resilience to label noise, suggesting that certain architectures may be inherently more robust due to their structural properties.

Implications

The findings from this paper hold substantial implications for both the theoretical understanding and practical deployment of deep learning systems:

  1. Model Development: Understanding the inherent robustness can influence the design of more efficient models that do not overly rely on clean labels, which are often costly to obtain.
  2. Training Strategies: The results suggest potential avenues for developing training protocols that capitalize on the observed robustness, such as adaptive learning rate schedules and noise-cognizant loss functions.
  3. Future Research: This work opens pathways for investigating how implicit regularization contributes to robustness and how these effects can be enhanced deliberately through architectural or algorithmic modifications.

Conclusion

Andreas Veit’s research illuminates a crucial aspect of deep learning—we can leverage the models' innate ability to withstand label noise, which offers flexibility in situations where data quality is compromised. The paper's insights encourage further exploration into resilience mechanisms and advance our understanding of how deep networks can be optimized for real-world applications where perfect labels are not guaranteed. As the field evolves, further exploration into the synergy between model architecture and noise robustness could lead to improved strategies for deploying reliable AI systems across various domains.