Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
80 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Ask the Right Questions: Active Question Reformulation with Reinforcement Learning (1705.07830v3)

Published 22 May 2017 in cs.CL and cs.AI

Abstract: We frame Question Answering (QA) as a Reinforcement Learning task, an approach that we call Active Question Answering. We propose an agent that sits between the user and a black box QA system and learns to reformulate questions to elicit the best possible answers. The agent probes the system with, potentially many, natural language reformulations of an initial question and aggregates the returned evidence to yield the best answer. The reformulation system is trained end-to-end to maximize answer quality using policy gradient. We evaluate on SearchQA, a dataset of complex questions extracted from Jeopardy!. The agent outperforms a state-of-the-art base model, playing the role of the environment, and other benchmarks. We also analyze the language that the agent has learned while interacting with the question answering system. We find that successful question reformulations look quite different from natural language paraphrases. The agent is able to discover non-trivial reformulation strategies that resemble classic information retrieval techniques such as term re-weighting (tf-idf) and stemming.

An In-Depth Review of Active Question Answering with Reinforcement Learning

The paper "Ask the Right Questions: Active Question Reformulation with Reinforcement Learning" presents a novel approach to question answering (QA) by employing a reinforcement learning framework to improve the interaction between users and QA systems. The core idea involves developing an agent that reformulates user questions in natural language to elicit optimal answers from an existing black-box QA system. The work is remarkable for its application of reinforcement learning (RL) to enhance question reformulation rather than attempting direct improvements on QA models themselves.

Overview of the Approach

The authors define QA as a reinforcement learning task, introducing an agent that acts as an intermediary between users and the QA system. The agent's primary function is to reformulate questions posed by users, thereby increasing the likelihood of receiving accurate and comprehensive answers. In essence, this process comprises multiple reformulations of the initial user question, allowing the agent to probe the system iteratively and evaluate evidence returned by the system before selecting the best possible answer. The agent operates independently of the internal mechanisms of the QA system, treating it as a black-box interface.

The fundamental components of the Active Question Answering (AQA) framework include:

  1. Question Reformulation - A sequence-to-sequence model pre-trained to generate alternative formulations of a given question.
  2. Answer Selection - A convolutional neural network designed to evaluate and choose the best answer from several candidates returned by the QA system.

Evaluation and Results

The paper employs the SearchQA dataset, which comprises complex questions derived from Jeopardy! clues, designed to test the agent's ability to reformulate questions into a more answerable format. The AQA model demonstrates significant improvements over state-of-the-art QA models, such as BiDAF, by achieving an absolute F1 score increase of 11.4%, equivalent to a relative improvement of 32% over the baseline model.

These results highlight the success of the AQA agent's reformulation strategies, which include search-like operations similar to term re-weighting and stemming observed in information retrieval systems. Such strategies are discovered and refined autonomously by the agent through reinforcement learning, suggesting a shift towards simplistic query adaptions, akin to traditional information retrieval methodologies.

Analysis of Reformulation Quality

In analyzing the agent's reformulated questions, the authors note distinct differences from conventional natural language paraphrases. The reformulations generated do not prioritize linguistic structures typical of everyday language, instead favoring strategic modifications that improve the probability of obtaining relevant answers from the QA system. This divergence highlights a potential limitation in current QA architectures, which may favor superficial pattern matching rather than deep semantic processing.

Implications and Future Directions

This research proposes significant theoretical and practical implications. It underscores the importance of question formulation in QA systems and introduces a RL-based approach, providing a pathway to surpass current QA models' limitations. The method demonstrates the potential for advancements in machine-machine communication, where reformulation agents could systematically optimize interactions with various information systems.

Future research could build upon this framework by exploring iterative and dynamic question answering models, further leveraging reinforcement learning to refine question interactions. Expanding beyond textual inputs to incorporate multi-modal data could also be pursued, enriching the scope of QA systems to provide more nuanced answers to users' queries.

In summary, this paper presents an innovative strategy by framing question refinement as a reinforcement learning problem, making strides toward intelligent QA systems that better mimic human-like inquiry processes. The results present a compelling case for integrating reformulation capabilities into QA systems, suggesting a promising avenue for future exploration and development.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (7)
  1. Christian Buck (15 papers)
  2. Jannis Bulian (14 papers)
  3. Massimiliano Ciaramita (15 papers)
  4. Wojciech Gajewski (5 papers)
  5. Andrea Gesmundo (20 papers)
  6. Neil Houlsby (62 papers)
  7. Wei Wang (1793 papers)
Citations (164)