Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Hitting minors on bounded treewidth graphs. I. General upper bounds (1704.07284v5)

Published 24 Apr 2017 in cs.DS, cs.CC, and math.CO

Abstract: For a finite collection of graphs ${\cal F}$, the ${\cal F}$-M-DELETION problem consists in, given a graph $G$ and an integer $k$, deciding whether there exists $S \subseteq V(G)$ with $|S| \leq k$ such that $G \setminus S$ does not contain any of the graphs in ${\cal F}$ as a minor. We are interested in the parameterized complexity of ${\cal F}$-M-DELETION when the parameter is the treewidth of $G$, denoted by $tw$. Our objective is to determine, for a fixed ${\cal F}$, the smallest function $f_{{\cal F}}$ such that {${\cal F}$-M-DELETION can be solved in time $f_{{\cal F}}(tw) \cdot n{O(1)}$ on $n$-vertex graphs. We prove that $f_{{\cal F}}(tw) = 2{2{O(tw \cdot\log tw)}}$ for every collection ${\cal F}$, that $f_{{\cal F}}(tw) = 2{O(tw \cdot\log tw)}$ if ${\cal F}$ contains a planar graph, and that $f_{{\cal F}}(tw) = 2{O(tw)}$ if in addition the input graph $G$ is planar or embedded in a surface. We also consider the version of the problem where the graphs in ${\cal F}$ are forbidden as topological minors, called ${\cal F}$-TM-DELETION. We prove similar results for this problem, except that in the last two algorithms, instead of requiring ${\cal F}$ to contain a planar graph, we need it to contain a subcubic planar graph. This is the first of a series of articles on this topic.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Julien Baste (25 papers)
  2. Ignasi Sau (71 papers)
  3. Dimitrios M. Thilikos (89 papers)
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.